Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Jan 4;49(1):4.
doi: 10.1186/s12711-016-0282-1.

Genetic analysis of teat number in pigs reveals some developmental pathways independent of vertebra number and several loci which only affect a specific side

Affiliations

Genetic analysis of teat number in pigs reveals some developmental pathways independent of vertebra number and several loci which only affect a specific side

Gary A Rohrer et al. Genet Sel Evol. .

Abstract

Background: Number of functional teats is an important trait in commercial swine production. As litter size increases, the number of teats must also increase to supply nutrition to all piglets. Therefore, a genome-wide association analysis was conducted to identify genomic regions that affect this trait in a commercial swine population. Genotypic data from the Illumina Porcine SNP60v1 BeadChip were available for 2951 animals with total teat number (TTN) records. A subset of these animals (n = 1828) had number of teats on each side recorded. From this information, the following traits were derived: number of teats on the left (LTN) and right side (RTN), maximum number of teats on a side (MAX), difference between LTN and RTN (L - R) and absolute value of L - R (DIF). Bayes C option of GENSEL (version 4.61) and 1-Mb windows were implemented. Identified regions that explained more than 1.5% of the genomic variation were tested in a larger group of animals (n = 5453) to estimate additive genetic effects.

Results: Marker heritabilities were highest for TTN (0.233), intermediate for individual side counts (0.088 to 0.115) and virtually nil for difference traits (0.002 for L - R and 0.006 for DIF). Each copy of the VRTN mutant allele increased teat count by 0.35 (TTN), 0.16 (LTN and RTN) and 0.19 (MAX). 15, 18, 13 and 18 one-Mb windows were detected that explained more than 1.0% of the genomic variation for TTN, LTN, RTN, and MAX, respectively. These regions cumulatively accounted for over 50% of the genomic variation of LTN, RTN and MAX, but only 30% of that of TTN. Sus scrofa chromosome SSC10:52 Mb was associated with all four count traits, while SSC10:60 and SSC14:54 Mb were associated with three count traits. Thirty-three SNPs accounted for nearly 39% of the additive genetic variation in the validation dataset. No effect of piglet sex or percentage of males in litter was detected, but birth weight was positively correlated with TTN.

Conclusions: Teat number is a heritable trait and use of genetic markers would expedite selection progress. Exploiting genetic variation associated with teat counts on each side would enhance selection focused on total teat counts. These results confirm QTL on SSC4, seven and ten and identify a novel QTL on SSC14.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Manhattan plot of GENSEL genome-wide association analysis for count traits. Horizontal axis is the position on the swine genome (Build 10.2) and the vertical axis is the percent of genomic variation associated with each 1-Mb window
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Average birth weight (kg) for piglets born by total number of teats from four different populations at USMARC derived from commercial genetics in 1980, 1993, 2000 and 2011. Each class has at least 800 animals represented in the mean value. No values for the 11 teat number class for 1993, 2000 or 2011 and the 17 teat number class for 1980 or 1993 are provided due to too few pigs

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Andersen IL, Nævdal E, Bøe KE. Maternal investment, sibling competition, and offspring survival with increasing litter size and parity in pigs (Sus scrofa) Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 2011;65:1159–1167. doi: 10.1007/s00265-010-1128-4. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Merks JWM, Mathur PK, Knol EF. New phenotypes for new breeding goals in pigs. Animal. 2012;6:535–543. doi: 10.1017/S1751731111002266. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Nielsen B, Su G, Lund MS, Madsen P. Selection for increased number of piglets at d 5 after farrowing has increased litter size and reduced piglet mortality. J Anim Sci. 2013;91:2575–2582. doi: 10.2527/jas.2012-5990. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cassady JP, Young LD, Leymaster KA. Heterosis and recombination effects on pig reproductive traits. J Anim Sci. 2002;80:2303–2315. doi: 10.2527/2002.8092303x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kim JS, Jin DI, Lee JH, Son DS, Lee SH, Yi YJ, et al. Effects of teat number on litter size in gilts. Anim Reprod Sci. 2005;90:111–116. doi: 10.1016/j.anireprosci.2005.01.013. - DOI - PubMed

Substances