International Osteoporosis Foundation and European Calcified Tissue Society Working Group. Recommendations for the screening of adherence to oral bisphosphonates
- PMID: 28093634
- PMCID: PMC5302161
- DOI: 10.1007/s00198-017-3906-6
International Osteoporosis Foundation and European Calcified Tissue Society Working Group. Recommendations for the screening of adherence to oral bisphosphonates
Abstract
Adherence to oral bisphosphonates is low. A screening strategy is proposed based on the response of biochemical markers of bone turnover after 3 months of therapy. If no change is observed, the clinician should reassess the adherence to the treatment and also other potential issues with the drug.
Introduction: Low adherence to oral bisphosphonates is a common problem that jeopardizes the efficacy of treatment of osteoporosis. No clear screening strategy for the assessment of compliance is widely accepted in these patients.
Methods: The International Osteoporosis Foundation and the European Calcified Tissue Society have convened a working group to propose a screening strategy to detect a lack of adherence to these drugs. The question to answer was whether the bone turnover markers (BTMs) PINP and CTX can be used to identify low adherence in patients with postmenopausal osteoporosis initiating oral bisphosphonates for osteoporosis. The findings of the TRIO study specifically address this question and were used as the basis for testing the hypothesis.
Results: Based on the findings of the TRIO study, specifically addressing this question, the working group recommends measuring PINP and CTX at baseline and 3 months after starting therapy to check for a decrease above the least significant change (decrease of more than 38% for PINP and 56% for CTX). Detection rate for the measurement of PINP is 84%, for CTX 87% and, if variation in at least one is considered when measuring both, the level of detection is 94.5%.
Conclusions: If a significant decrease is observed, the treatment can continue, but if no decrease occurs, the clinician should reassess to identify problems with the treatment, mainly low adherence.
Keywords: Adherence; Bisphosphonates; Osteoporosis treatment; Position paper; Screening.
Conflict of interest statement
A Diez-Perez is speaker or advisor for Amgen, Lilly, Merck, UCB and Active Life Sci. Bo Abrahamsen reports current institutional research grants and contracts with Novartis and UCB, past institutional research contracts with Amgen and NPS Pharmaceuticals. D. Agnusdei has a consultancy contract with Eli Lilly. Erik F Eriksen is a speaker and advisor for Amgen, Lilly, Merck, IDS and Shire. Núria Guañabens is speaker or advisor for Amgen, Lilly and Alexion Pharmaceuticals. Robert Josse is medical advisory board member and speaker honoraria and research grant: Merck,Amgen,Lilly. Daniel Prieto-Alhambra’s research group has received unrestricted grants from AMGEN S.A. Jean-Yves Reginster has consulting fees or paid advisory boards in Servier, Novartis, Negma, Lilly, Wyeth, Amgen, GlaxoSmithKline, Roche, Merckle, Nycomed-Takeda, NPS, IBSA-Genevrier, Theramex, UCB, Asahi Kasei, Endocyte, Radius Health also has lecture fees when speaking at the invitation of the commercial sponsors: Merck Sharp and Dohme, Lilly, Rottapharm, IBSA, Genevrier, Novartis, Servier, Roche, GlaxoSmithKline, Merckle, Teijin, Teva, Analis, Theramex, Nycomed, NovoNordisk, Ebewee Pharma, Zodiac, Danone, Will Pharma, Amgen, PharmEvo. He has grant support from industry: Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Rottapharm, Teva, Roche, Amgen, Lilly, Novartis, GlaxoSmithKline, Servier, Pfizer, Theramex, Danone, Organon, Therabel, Boehringer, Chiltern, Galapagos. M. Carola Zillikens has received fee for speaking and advice from Amgen, Eli Lilly and MSD. R. Eastell has consulting fees from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Chronos, GSK, Immunodiagnostic Systems, Fonterra Brands, Ono Pharma, Lilly, Bayer, Janssen Research, Alere, CL Biosystems, Teijin Pharm, D-Star, Roche Diagnostics, Inverness Medical; grant support from Amgen, Alexion, Immunodiagnostic Systems, Roche, AstraZeneca. Kim E Naylor, Maria Luisa Brandi, Cyrus Cooper, Elaine Dennison, Deborah Gold, Peyman Hadji, Mickael Hiligsmann, Robert Horne, John A Kanis, Barbara Obermayer-Pietsch, René Rizzoli, and Stuart Silverman have no conflict of interest.
Figures
Comment in
-
Comments on Diez-Perez et al.: Recommendations for the screening of adherence to oral bisphosphonates.Osteoporos Int. 2017 Jul;28(7):2255-2256. doi: 10.1007/s00198-017-3987-2. Epub 2017 Mar 10. Osteoporos Int. 2017. PMID: 28283688 No abstract available.
-
Recommendations for the screening of adherence to oral bisphosphonates: reply to comments by Zhou and Sheng.Osteoporos Int. 2017 Jul;28(7):2257-2258. doi: 10.1007/s00198-017-3991-6. Epub 2017 Mar 10. Osteoporos Int. 2017. PMID: 28283689 No abstract available.
References
-
- Cramer JA, Gold DT, Silverman SL, Lewiecki EM. A systematic review of persistence and compliance with bisphosphonates for osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int. 2007;18(8):1023–31. - PubMed
-
- Kothawala P, Badamgarav E, Ryu S, Miller RM, Halbert RJ. Systematic review and meta-analysis of real-world adherence to drug therapy for osteoporosis. Mayo Clin Proc. 2007;82(12):1493–501. - PubMed
-
- Hiligsmann M, Rabenda V, Gathon HJ, Ethgen O, Reginster JY. Potential clinical and economic impact of nonadherence with osteoporosis medications. Calcif Tissue Int. 2010;86(3):202–10. - PubMed
-
- Hiligsmann M, Salas M, Hughes DA, Manias E, Gwadry-Sridhar FH, Linck P, et al. Interventions to improve osteoporosis medication adherence and persistence: a systematic review and literature appraisal by the ISPOR Medication Adherence & Persistence Special Interest Group. Osteoporos Int. 2013;24(12):2907–18. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
