Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Mar;49(1):17-27.
doi: 10.1363/psrh.12015. Epub 2017 Jan 17.

Abortion Incidence and Service Availability In the United States, 2014

Affiliations

Abortion Incidence and Service Availability In the United States, 2014

Rachel K Jones et al. Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2017 Mar.

Abstract

Context: National and state-level information about abortion incidence can help inform policies and programs intended to reduce levels of unintended pregnancy.

Methods: In 2015-2016, all U.S. facilities known or expected to have provided abortion services in 2013 or 2014 were surveyed. Data on the number of abortions were combined with population data to estimate national and state-level abortion rates. The number of abortion-providing facilities and changes since a similar 2011 survey were also assessed. The number and type of new abortion restrictions were examined in the states that had experienced the largest proportionate changes in clinics providing abortion services.

Results: In 2014, an estimated 926,200 abortions were performed in the United States, 12% fewer than in 2011; the 2014 abortion rate was 14.6 abortions per 1,000 women aged 15-44, representing a 14% decline over this period. The number of clinics providing abortions declined 6% between 2011 and 2014, and declines were steepest in the Midwest (22%) and the South (13%). Early medication abortions accounted for 31% of nonhospital abortions, up from 24% in 2011. Most states that experienced the largest proportionate declines in the number of clinics providing abortions had enacted one or more new restrictions during the study period, but reductions were not always associated with declines in abortion incidence.

Conclusions: The relationship between abortion access, as measured by the number of clinics, and abortion rates is not straightforward. Further research is needed to understand the decline in abortion incidence.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Percentage of abortion-providing facilities accounted for by each facility type, and percentage of abortions that are performed in each type of facility, 2014

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Finer LB, Zolna MR. Declines in unintended pregnancy in the United States, 2008–2011. New England Journal of Medicine. 2016;374(9):843–852. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Jones RK, Jerman J. Abortion incidence and service availability in the United States, 2011. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health. 2014;46(1):3–14. doi: 10.1363/46e0414. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Jones RK, Kooistra K. Abortion incidence and access to services in the United States, 2008. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health. 2011;43(1):41–50. - PubMed
    1. Finer LB, Jerman J, Kavanaugh ML. Changes in use of long-acting contraceptive methods in the United States, 2007–2009. Fertility and Sterility. 2012;98(4):893–897. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kavanaugh ML, Jerman J, Finer LB. Changes in use of long- acting reversible contraceptive methods among U. S women, 2009–2012. Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2015;126(5):917–927. - PMC - PubMed