Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Jan 17;12(1):e0170230.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0170230. eCollection 2017.

Evaluating Silent Reading Performance with an Eye Tracking System in Patients with Glaucoma

Affiliations

Evaluating Silent Reading Performance with an Eye Tracking System in Patients with Glaucoma

Noriaki Murata et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the relationship between silent reading performance and visual field defects in patients with glaucoma using an eye tracking system.

Methods: Fifty glaucoma patients (Group G; mean age, 52.2 years, standard deviation: 11.4 years) and 20 normal controls (Group N; mean age, 46.9 years; standard deviation: 17.2 years) were included in the study. All participants in Group G had early to advanced glaucomatous visual field defects but better than 20/20 visual acuity in both eyes. Participants silently read Japanese articles written horizontally while the eye tracking system monitored and calculated reading duration per 100 characters, number of fixations per 100 characters, and mean fixation duration, which were compared with mean deviation and visual field index values from Humphrey visual field testing (24-2 and 10-2 Swedish interactive threshold algorithm standard) of the right versus left eye and the better versus worse eye.

Results: There was a statistically significant difference between Groups G and N in mean fixation duration (G, 233.4 msec; N, 215.7 msec; P = 0.010). Within Group G, significant correlations were observed between reading duration and 24-2 right mean deviation (rs = -0.280, P = 0.049), 24-2 right visual field index (rs = -0.306, P = 0.030), 24-2 worse visual field index (rs = -0.304, P = 0.032), and 10-2 worse mean deviation (rs = -0.326, P = 0.025). Significant correlations were observed between mean fixation duration and 10-2 left mean deviation (rs = -0.294, P = 0.045) and 10-2 worse mean deviation (rs = -0.306, P = 0.037), respectively.

Conclusions: The severity of visual field defects may influence some aspects of reading performance. At least concerning silent reading, the visual field of the worse eye is an essential element of smoothness of reading.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Tobii Tx300 setup during the reading experiment.
Participants were evaluated during silent reading without a forehead and a chin rest in order to reproduce reading conditions in daily life. Participants were instructed not to lean forward in order to maintain the test distance. It is important to note that our reading experiment included the process of measuring either the point of gaze or the motion of an eye relative to the head. Therefore, we excluded data during saccades from the analysis of reading performance.
Fig 2
Fig 2. A participant’s gaze pattern during the reading experiment.
The articles contain both Japanese syllabary (Hiragana) and Chinese characters (Kanji). A participant reads sentences in a horizontal direction from left to right. The size of the circle corresponds to the fixation duration. The number in the circle is the rank of fixation. The lines represent saccades.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Thylefors B, Negrel AD. The global impact of glaucoma. Bull World Health Organ. 1994;72(3):323–6. Epub 1994/01/01. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Quigley HA, Broman AT. The number of people with glaucoma worldwide in 2010 and 2020. Br J Ophthalmol. 2006;90(3):262–7. Epub 2006/02/21. 10.1136/bjo.2005.081224 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Viswanathan AC, McNaught AI, Poinoosawmy D, Fontana L, Crabb DP, Fitzke FW, et al. Severity and stability of glaucoma: patient perception compared with objective measurement. Arch Ophthalmol. 1999;117(4):450–4. Epub 1999/04/17. - PubMed
    1. Ramulu P. Glaucoma and disability: which tasks are affected, and at what stage of disease? Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2009;20(2):92–8. Epub 2009/02/26. 10.1097/ICU.0b013e32832401a9 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Crabb DP, Smith ND, Glen FC, Burton R, Garway-Heath DF. How does glaucoma look?: patient perception of visual field loss. Ophthalmology. 2013;120(6):1120–6. Epub 2013/02/19. 10.1016/j.ophtha.2012.11.043 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types