Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Apr 15;13(4):551-555.
doi: 10.5664/jcsm.6540.

Potential Underestimation of Sleep Apnea Severity by At-Home Kits: Rescoring In-Laboratory Polysomnography Without Sleep Staging

Affiliations

Potential Underestimation of Sleep Apnea Severity by At-Home Kits: Rescoring In-Laboratory Polysomnography Without Sleep Staging

Matt T Bianchi et al. J Clin Sleep Med. .

Abstract

Study objectives: Home sleep apnea testing (HSAT) is increasingly available for diagnosing obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). One key limitation of most HSAT involves the lack of sleep staging, such that the respiratory event index is calculated using the total recording time (TRT) rather than total sleep time (TST).

Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of n = 838 diagnostic polysomnography (PSG) nights from our center; n = 444 with OSA (4% rule, apneahypopnea index (AHI) ≥ 5), and n = 394 with AHI < 5. We recalculated the AHI using time in bed (TIB) instead of TST, to assess the predicted underestimation risk of OSA severity.

Results: Of all the patients with OSA, 26.4% would be reclassified as having less severe or no OSA after recalculating the AHI using TIB rather than TST. Of the n = 275 with mild OSA, 18.5% would be reclassified as not having OSA. The risk of underestimation was higher in those with moderate or severe OSA. Of the n = 119 moderate OSA cases, 40.3% would be reclassified as mild, and of the n = 50 severe OSA cases, 36.0% would be reclassified as moderate. Age strongly correlated with the degree of underestimation of the AHI, because age was significantly correlated with time awake during PSG.

Conclusions: The risk of sleep apnea underestimation is predicted to be substantial in a tertiary sleep center population. Phenotyping errors included risk of falsely negative results (from mild to normal), as well as category errors: moderate or severe moving to mild or moderate severity, respectively. Clinicians should recognize this underestimation limitation, which directly affects diagnostic phenotyping and thus therapeutic decisions.

Commentary: A commentary on this article appears in this issue on page 531.

Keywords: diagnosis; prediction; underestimation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Reclassification based on scoring polysomnography using time in bed as denominator for the apnea-hypopnea index calculation.
Bar chart shows the percentage of the cohort (n = 444) with obstructive sleep apnea during clinical polysomnography, with apnea-hypopnea index ≥ 5 using the objective total sleep time as the denominator (standard clinical scoring) that are reclassified after scoring based on time in bed as the denominator (as if undergoing home sleep apnea testing). 26.4% moved at least one category less severe (black bar). Approximately 10% of the cohort moved specifically from mild to none, which represents approximately 18% of mild cases (51 of 275). Approximately 10% of the cohort moved from moderate to mild, but this represents approximately 40% of the moderate cases (48 of 119). A smaller percent of the cohort moved from severe to moderate, but this represents 36% of severe cases (18 of 50). mod = moderate, sev = severe.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Reclassification based on scoring polysomnography using subjective total sleep time as the denominator for the apnea-hypopnea index calculation.
Scatterplots show the subjective total sleep time (sTST, y-axis) and objective total sleep time (oTST, x-axis) pairing for each subject in the cohort with obstructive sleep apnea (A), or without obstructive sleep apnea (B). The diagonal dotted line is the identity line for reference. (C) The percentage of the cohort misclassified by type of misclassification. Above each bar is the percentage of each severity category that was misclassified. mod = moderate, sev = severe.

Comment in

References

    1. Collop NA, Tracy SL, Kapur V, et al. Obstructive sleep apnea devices for out-of-center (OOC) testing: technology evaluation. J Clin Sleep Med. 2011;7(5):531–548. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Westbrook PR, Levendowski DJ, Cvetinovic M, et al. Description and validation of the apnea risk evaluation system: a novel method to diagnose sleep apneahypopnea in the home. Chest. 2005;128(4):2166–2175. - PubMed
    1. Aurora RN, Swartz R, Punjabi NM. Misclassification of OSA severity with automated scoring of home sleep recordings. Chest. 2015;147(3):719–727. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bianchi MT, Williams KL, McKinney S, Ellenbogen JM. The subjective-objective mismatch in sleep perception among those with insomnia and sleep apnea. J Sleep Res. 2013;22(5):557–568. - PubMed
    1. Castillo J, Goparaju B, Bianchi MT. Sleep-wake misperception in sleep apnea patients undergoing diagnostic versus titration polysomnography. J Psychosom Res. 2014;76(5):361–367. - PMC - PubMed