Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2017 Apr;38(4):643-650.
doi: 10.1007/s10072-017-2817-9. Epub 2017 Jan 17.

VRT (verbal reasoning test): a new test for assessment of verbal reasoning. Test realization and Italian normative data from a multicentric study

Affiliations
Multicenter Study

VRT (verbal reasoning test): a new test for assessment of verbal reasoning. Test realization and Italian normative data from a multicentric study

Benedetta Basagni et al. Neurol Sci. 2017 Apr.

Abstract

Verbal reasoning is a complex, multicomponent function, which involves activation of functional processes and neural circuits distributed in both brain hemispheres. Thus, this ability is often impaired after brain injury. The aim of the present study is to describe the construction of a new verbal reasoning test (VRT) for patients with brain injury and to provide normative values in a sample of healthy Italian participants. Three hundred and eighty healthy Italian subjects (193 women and 187 men) of different ages (range 16-75 years) and educational level (primary school to postgraduate degree) underwent the VRT. VRT is composed of seven subtests, investigating seven different domains. Multiple linear regression analysis revealed a significant effect of age and education on the participants' performance in terms of both VRT total score and all seven subtest scores. No gender effect was found. A correction grid for raw scores was built from the linear equation derived from the scores. Inferential cut-off scores were estimated using a non-parametric technique, and equivalent scores were computed. We also provided a grid for the correction of results by z scores.

Keywords: Assessment; Brain injury; Italian normative data; Verbal reasoning.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 1997 Dec;19(6):795-809 - PubMed
    1. J Neurol Psychopathol. 1936 Jul;17(65):27-40 - PubMed
    1. Cereb Cortex. 2005 Mar;15(3):239-49 - PubMed
    1. Neurology. 2000 Dec 12;55(11):1621-6 - PubMed
    1. Brain Lang. 1976 Jan;3(1):41-6 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources