Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Jan 4:7:658.
doi: 10.3389/fphys.2016.00658. eCollection 2016.

Living at a Geographically Higher Elevation Is Associated with Lower Risk of Metabolic Syndrome: Prospective Analysis of the SUN Cohort

Affiliations

Living at a Geographically Higher Elevation Is Associated with Lower Risk of Metabolic Syndrome: Prospective Analysis of the SUN Cohort

Amaya Lopez-Pascual et al. Front Physiol. .

Abstract

Living in a geographically higher altitude affects oxygen availability. The possible connection between environmental factors and the development of metabolic syndrome (MetS) feature is not fully understood, being the available epidemiological evidence still very limited. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the longitudinal association between altitude and incidence of MetS and each of its components in a prospective Spanish cohort, The Seguimiento Universidad de Navarra (SUN) project. Our study included 6860 highly educated subjects (university graduates) free from any MetS criteria at baseline. The altitude of residence was imputed with the postal code of each individual subject residence according to the data of the Spanish National Cartographic Institute and participants were categorized into tertiles. MetS was defined according to the harmonized definition. Cox proportional hazards models were used to assess the association between the altitude of residence and the risk of MetS during follow-up. After a median follow-up period of 10 years, 462 incident cases of MetS were identified. When adjusting for potential confounders, subjects in the highest category of altitude (>456 m) exhibited a significantly lower risk of developing MetS compared to those in the lowest tertile (<122 m) of altitude of residence [Model 2: Hazard ratio = 0.75 (95% Confidence interval: 0.58-0.97); p for trend = 0.029]. Living at geographically higher altitude was associated with a lower risk of developing MetS in the SUN project. Our findings suggest that geographical elevation may be an important factor linked to metabolic diseases.

Keywords: cohort studies; environmental health; metabolic syndrome; morbidity; preventive medicine.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow-chart displaying the participants included in the analyses. N, number of subjects; MetS, Metabolic syndrome; CVD, cardiovascular disease.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Risk of developing each component of MetS according to the altitude level. Multiple adjusted* hazard ratios and 95% CI of incident MetS (harmonized IDF-AHA/NHLBI) according to the altitude of residence. The SUN Project 1999–2012. m, meters; * Adjusted for: gender, BMI, total energy intake, adherence to Mediterranean dietary pattern, physical activity, sedentary behavior, hours sitting, smoking status, snacking between meals, following special diets, sleeping time, and alcohol intake.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Sensitivity analyses excluding subjects with family history of chronic disease. Multiple adjusted* hazard ratios and 95% CI of incident MetS (harmonized IDF-AHA/NHLBI) according to the altitude of residence. The SUN Project 1999–2012. Overall, all the participants included in the main analysis; HBP, high blood pressure; Ref, reference; Alt1, altitude tertile 1; Alt2, altitude tertile 2; Alt3, altitude tertile 3; * Adjusted for: gender, BMI, total energy intake, adherence to Mediterranean dietary pattern, physical activity, sedentary behavior, hours sitting, smoking status, snacking between meals, following special diets, sleeping time, and alcohol intake.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Abete I., Astrup A., Martinez J. A., Thorsdottir I., Zulet M. A. (2010). Obesity and the metabolic syndrome: role of different dietary macronutrient distribution patterns and specific nutritional components on weight loss and maintenance. Nutr. Rev. 68, 214–231. 10.1111/j.1753-4887.2010.00280.x - DOI - PubMed
    1. Alberti K. G., Eckel R. H., Grundy S. M., Zimmet P. Z., Cleeman J. I., Donato K. A., et al. . (2009). Harmonizing the metabolic syndrome: a joint interim statement of the International Diabetes Federation Task Force on Epidemiology and Prevention; National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; American Heart Association; World Heart Federation; International Atherosclerosis Society; and International Association for the Study of Obesity. Circulation 120, 1640–1645. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.192644 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Alonso A., Segui-Gomez M., de Irala J., Sanchez-Villegas A., Beunza J. J., Martinez-Gonzalez M. A. (2006). Predictors of follow-up and assessment of selection bias from dropouts using inverse probability weighting in a cohort of university graduates. Eur. J. Epidemiol. 21, 351–358. 10.1007/s10654-006-9008-y - DOI - PubMed
    1. Balarini C. M., Braga V. A. (2016). Editorial: new translational insights on metabolic syndrome: obesity, hypertension, diabetes and beyond. Front. Physiol. 7:229. 10.3389/978-2-88919-924-2 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Barrio-Lopez M. T., Bes-Rastrollo M., Beunza J. J., Fernandez-Montero A., Garcia-Lopez M., Martinez-Gonzalez M. A. (2011). Validation of metabolic syndrome using medical records in the SUN cohort. BMC Public Health 11:867. 10.1186/1471-2458-11-867 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources