Recombination correlates with synaptonemal complex length and chromatin loop size in bovids-insights into mammalian meiotic chromosomal organization
- PMID: 28101670
- DOI: 10.1007/s00412-016-0624-3
Recombination correlates with synaptonemal complex length and chromatin loop size in bovids-insights into mammalian meiotic chromosomal organization
Abstract
Homologous chromosomes exchange genetic information through recombination during meiosis, a process that increases genetic diversity, and is fundamental to sexual reproduction. In an attempt to shed light on the dynamics of mammalian recombination and its implications for genome organization, we have studied the recombination characteristics of 112 individuals belonging to 28 different species in the family Bovidae. In particular, we analyzed the distribution of RAD51 and MLH1 foci during the meiotic prophase I that serve, respectively, as proxies for double-strand breaks (DSBs) which form in early stages of meiosis and for crossovers. In addition, synaptonemal complex length and meiotic DNA loop size were estimated to explore how genome organization determines DSBs and crossover patterns. We show that although the number of meiotic DSBs per cell and recombination rates observed vary between individuals of the same species, these are correlated with diploid number as well as with synaptonemal complex and DNA loop sizes. Our results illustrate that genome packaging, DSB frequencies, and crossover rates tend to be correlated, while meiotic chromosomal axis length and DNA loop size are inversely correlated in mammals. Moreover, axis length, DSB frequency, and crossover frequencies all covary, suggesting that these correlations are established in the early stages of meiosis.
Keywords: Bovidae; Crossovers; MLH1; Meiosis; RAD51; Recombination.
Similar articles
-
Effect of species-specific differences in chromosome morphology on chromatin compaction and the frequency and distribution of RAD51 and MLH1 foci in two bovid species: cattle (Bos taurus) and the common eland (Taurotragus oryx).Chromosoma. 2016 Mar;125(1):137-49. doi: 10.1007/s00412-015-0533-x. Epub 2015 Jul 21. Chromosoma. 2016. PMID: 26194101
-
Variation in genome-wide levels of meiotic recombination is established at the onset of prophase in mammalian males.PLoS Genet. 2014 Jan 30;10(1):e1004125. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1004125. eCollection 2014 Jan. PLoS Genet. 2014. PMID: 24497841 Free PMC article.
-
Meiotic Recombination in the Giraffe (G. reticulata).Cytogenet Genome Res. 2017;152(2):73-80. doi: 10.1159/000478684. Epub 2017 Jul 20. Cytogenet Genome Res. 2017. PMID: 28723680
-
The choice in meiosis - defining the factors that influence crossover or non-crossover formation.J Cell Sci. 2011 Feb 15;124(Pt 4):501-13. doi: 10.1242/jcs.074427. J Cell Sci. 2011. PMID: 21282472 Review.
-
Control of Meiotic Crossovers: From Double-Strand Break Formation to Designation.Annu Rev Genet. 2016 Nov 23;50:175-210. doi: 10.1146/annurev-genet-120215-035111. Epub 2016 Sep 14. Annu Rev Genet. 2016. PMID: 27648641 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Crossover Interference, Crossover Maturation, and Human Aneuploidy.Bioessays. 2019 Oct;41(10):e1800221. doi: 10.1002/bies.201800221. Epub 2019 Aug 19. Bioessays. 2019. PMID: 31424607 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Three-Dimensional Genomic Structure and Cohesin Occupancy Correlate with Transcriptional Activity during Spermatogenesis.Cell Rep. 2019 Jul 9;28(2):352-367.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2019.06.037. Cell Rep. 2019. PMID: 31291573 Free PMC article.
-
Alterations in synaptonemal complex coding genes and human infertility.Int J Biol Sci. 2022 Feb 21;18(5):1933-1943. doi: 10.7150/ijbs.67843. eCollection 2022. Int J Biol Sci. 2022. PMID: 35342360 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Fragile, unfaithful and persistent Ys-on how meiosis can shape sex chromosome evolution.Heredity (Edinb). 2022 Jul;129(1):22-30. doi: 10.1038/s41437-022-00532-2. Epub 2022 Apr 22. Heredity (Edinb). 2022. PMID: 35459933 Free PMC article.
-
ATM controls meiotic DNA double-strand break formation and recombination and affects synaptonemal complex organization in plants.Plant Cell. 2021 Jul 2;33(5):1633-1656. doi: 10.1093/plcell/koab045. Plant Cell. 2021. PMID: 33659989 Free PMC article.
References
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
- P502/11/0719/Grantová Agentura České Republiky (CZ)
- ED1.1.00/02.0068/European Regional Development Fund
- CGL-2010-20170/Secretaría de Estado de Investigación, Desarrollo e Innovación
- CGL-2014-54317-P/Secretaría de Estado de Investigación, Desarrollo e Innovación
- BFU2015-71786-REDT/Secretaría de Estado de Investigación, Desarrollo e Innovación
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Research Materials