Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2017 Apr;47(4):450-457.
doi: 10.1007/s00247-016-3771-z. Epub 2017 Jan 19.

Intravascular ultrasound versus digital subtraction angiography: direct comparison of intraluminal diameter measurements in pediatric and adolescent imaging

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Intravascular ultrasound versus digital subtraction angiography: direct comparison of intraluminal diameter measurements in pediatric and adolescent imaging

Anne E Gill et al. Pediatr Radiol. 2017 Apr.

Abstract

Background: Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) allows intraluminal imaging of blood vessels rather than the one-dimensional luminal outline depicted by digital subtraction angiography (DSA). Despite extensive literature in multiple adult vascular diseases, IVUS has not been directly compared to DSA in pediatric and adolescent vascular pathologies.

Objective: The purpose of this manuscript is to compare absolute luminal diameter measurements obtained via IVUS and DSA during a variety of pediatric endovascular procedures.

Materials and methods: We conducted a retrospective review of all pediatric and adolescent endovascular procedures from October 2014 to March 2016 in which IVUS and DSA were used. We compared the vessel diameter measurements and analyzed them using SAS software with a paired t-test.

Results: There were 102 total measurements (DSA = 56; IVUS = 56; 22 procedures; 20 patients). On average, IVUS measured 0.6 ± 2.1 mm larger than DSA (95% confidence interval [CI] -0.01 to 1.12; P = 0.06; r = 0.90). When venous compression syndrome (May-Thurner, Nutcracker, superior vena cava syndrome) measurements were excluded, IVUS measured 0.7 ± 1.6 mm larger than DSA (95% CI 0.14 to 1.18; P = 0.01; r = 0.93). When venous compression syndrome measurements were evaluated separately, IVUS measured 0.3 ± 3.0 mm larger than DSA (95% CI -1.16 to 1.82; P = 0.65; r = 0.45).

Conclusion: Overall, IVUS measurements were slightly larger than DSA measurements in all data subsets. Absolute vessel diameter measurements obtained with IVUS in the pediatric and adolescent population are statistically significantly larger than those obtained using DSA when excluding venous compression syndromes. In venous compression syndromes, IVUS might provide a more accurate representation of vessel compression and diameter than DSA.

Keywords: Children; Digital subtraction angiography; Intravascular ultrasound; Measurement; Venous compression syndromes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2016 Feb;27(2):167-73 - PubMed
    1. Semin Vasc Surg. 2006 Sep;19(3):128-31 - PubMed
    1. Semin Vasc Surg. 2004 Jun;17(2):110-8 - PubMed
    1. World J Radiol. 2015 Nov 28;7(11):375-81 - PubMed
    1. J Vasc Surg. 2002 Apr;35(4):694-700 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources