Efficacy and safety of a fixed bimonthly ranibizumab treatment regimen in eyes with neovascular age-related macular degeneration: results from the RABIMO trial
- PMID: 28102456
- DOI: 10.1007/s00417-017-3589-x
Efficacy and safety of a fixed bimonthly ranibizumab treatment regimen in eyes with neovascular age-related macular degeneration: results from the RABIMO trial
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate prospectively the efficacy and safety of a fixed bimonthly ranibizumab treatment regimen (RABIMO) in eyes with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) and to compare these results with a pro re nata (PRN) treatment scheme.
Methods: This was a 12-month, phase IV, single center, randomised, non-inferiority study. Following three initial monthly injections, patients were randomised to receive either ranibizumab bimonthly (RABIMO group) or ranibizumab PRN (PRN group) (n = 20 each). Main outcome measures were best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central retinal thickness (CRT), number of injections, and adverse events (AEs).
Results: BCVA [median (interquartile range, IQR)] increased significantly in both groups after 12 months [RABIMO group +8.5 (14); PRN group +6.5 (16) ETDRS letters] when compared to baseline (p < 0.0001; p = 0.0085). At month 12, the RABIMO treatment regimen was non-inferior to the PRN scheme (∆BCVA = 3.5 ETDRS letters; p < 0.0001). CRT was significantly reduced in both groups after the 12-month study period (p < 0.0001 each), with no significant difference between groups (p = 0.6772). Number of overall injections [median (IQR)] was 8 (0) in the RABIMO versus 4 (5) in the PRN group (p = 0.0037). Three patients in the RABIMO group received one additional unscheduled injection. We observed no significant differences between groups in the number of patients with reported SAEs/AEs (RABIMO group n = 6/15; PRN group n = 7/13) (p = 0.7357/p = 0.4902).
Conclusions: We found no evidence of significant functional or anatomical differences between the RABIMO and PRN treatment regimens. However, the RABIMO group's number of injections was twice as high as the PRN group's (protocol-driven). In light of potential side effects, the fixed bimonthly treatment regimen might not be advisable for routine clinical care, but it might be a worthwhile treatment option if monthly monitoring is not possible. Eudra-CT number: 2009-017324-11.
Keywords: AMD; Age-related macular degeneration; Optical coherence tomography; PRN; Ranibizumab; Treatment schedule.
Similar articles
-
Treatment regimens for administration of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor agents for neovascular age-related macular degeneration.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 May 5;5(5):CD012208. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012208.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020. PMID: 32374423 Free PMC article.
-
Bimonthly, treat-and-extend and as-needed ranibizumab in naïve neovascular age-related macular degeneration patients: 12-month outcomes of a randomized study.Acta Ophthalmol. 2020 Nov;98(7):e820-e829. doi: 10.1111/aos.14399. Epub 2020 Mar 19. Acta Ophthalmol. 2020. PMID: 32190990 Clinical Trial.
-
Role of intraretinal and subretinal fluid on clinical and anatomical outcomes in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration treated with bimonthly, treat-and-extend and as-needed ranibizumab in the In-Eye study.Acta Ophthalmol. 2021 Dec;99(8):861-870. doi: 10.1111/aos.14786. Epub 2021 Mar 15. Acta Ophthalmol. 2021. PMID: 33720541 Clinical Trial.
-
24-month clinical outcomes of a treat-and-extend regimen with ranibizumab for wet age-related macular degeneration in a real life setting.BMC Ophthalmol. 2017 Apr 27;17(1):58. doi: 10.1186/s12886-017-0451-1. BMC Ophthalmol. 2017. PMID: 28449645 Free PMC article.
-
The Treat-and-Extend Injection Regimen Versus Alternate Dosing Strategies in Age-related Macular Degeneration: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Am J Ophthalmol. 2018 Aug;192:184-197. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2018.05.026. Epub 2018 Jun 6. Am J Ophthalmol. 2018. PMID: 29885297
Cited by
-
The Injection Practice Patterns of Retina Specialists in Managing Exudative Age-Related Macular Degeneration: A Retrospective Study.Clin Ophthalmol. 2023 Jan 25;17:375-383. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S391282. eCollection 2023. Clin Ophthalmol. 2023. PMID: 36721668 Free PMC article.
-
Efficacy and Safety of Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Monotherapies for Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration: A Mixed Treatment Comparison.Front Pharmacol. 2021 Dec 21;12:797108. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2021.797108. eCollection 2021. Front Pharmacol. 2021. PMID: 34992542 Free PMC article.
-
Treatment regimens for administration of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor agents for neovascular age-related macular degeneration.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 May 5;5(5):CD012208. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012208.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020. PMID: 32374423 Free PMC article.
-
Efficacy, Safety, and Injection Frequency with Novel Aflibercept 8 mg in Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration: A Comparison with Existing Anti-VEGF Regimens Using a Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis.Ophthalmol Ther. 2025 Apr;14(4):733-753. doi: 10.1007/s40123-025-01098-y. Epub 2025 Feb 24. Ophthalmol Ther. 2025. PMID: 39994103 Free PMC article.
-
Efficacy and safety of faricimab for neovascular age-related macular degeneration: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.BMJ Open Ophthalmol. 2024 Jul 23;9(1):e001702. doi: 10.1136/bmjophth-2024-001702. BMJ Open Ophthalmol. 2024. PMID: 39043575 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Research Materials