Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2016 Dec 1:10:698.
doi: 10.3332/ecancer.2016.698. eCollection 2016.

The current status of prophylactic femoral intramedullary nailing for metastatic cancer

Affiliations
Review

The current status of prophylactic femoral intramedullary nailing for metastatic cancer

N M Ormsby et al. Ecancermedicalscience. .

Abstract

The most common site for cancer to spread is bone. At post-mortem, bony metastases have been found in 70% of patients dying from breast and prostate cancer. Due to the prevalence of cancer, bone metastasis and the associated management represents a huge burden on NHS resources. In patients with metastasis, around 56% of these involve the lower limb long bones. Due to the huge forces placed upon long bones during weight bearing, there is a high risk of fracture through areas of metastasis. It is reported that 23% of pathological fractures occur in the femoral subtrochanteric region. This area is subjected to forces up to four times the body weight, resulting in poor union rate for these fractures, and significant morbidity associated with difficulty in mobilising, and in patient nursing. As cancer treatments improve, the life expectancy in this subgroup of patients is likely to increase. Therefore medium-to-long-term management of these fractures, beyond the palliative, will become essential. We aim to evaluate the current management for metastatic malignant femoral disease, with particular focus on the prophylactic augmentation of diseased femorii using intramedullary nails.

Keywords: arthroplasty; internal fixation; intramedullary nailing; metastatic cancer; pathological fracture; prophylactic nailing.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Harringtonʼs criteria for predicting risk of pathological fracture.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. Mirelsʼ scoring system for pathological fracture prediction.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.. CT-based rigidity analysis (CTRA).

References

    1. UK Cr Cancer mortality statistics 2011. [Available from: http://www.cancerresearchuk.org/health-professional/cancer-mortality-sta....
    1. Gavrilov LA, Heuveline P PDaGM. New York: Macmillan Reference USA; 2003. Aging of population.
    1. Coleman RE. Clinical features of metastatic bone disease and risk of skeletal morbidity. Clin Cancer Res. 2006;12(20 Pt2):6243s–9s. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-06-0931. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Galasko C. Boston: GK Hall; 1981. The anatomy and pathways of skeletal metastases.
    1. Weikert DR, Schwartz HS. Intramedullary nailing for impending pathological subtrochanteric fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1991;73(4):668–70. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources