Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Mar;28(3):327-331.
doi: 10.1111/jopr.12585. Epub 2017 Jan 20.

Effects of Luting Composites on the Resultant Colors of Ceramic Veneers to Intended Shade Tab

Affiliations

Effects of Luting Composites on the Resultant Colors of Ceramic Veneers to Intended Shade Tab

Qing Li. J Prosthodont. 2019 Mar.

Abstract

Purpose: To investigate the color differences of ceramic veneers and the intended shade tab, and evaluate the effects of luting composites on the resultant colors of ceramic veneers.

Materials and methods: Pressable leucite-reinforced feldspathic ceramic discs (IPS e.max), with nominal shade A3, were fabricated with thicknesses of 1.0 mm, 0.7 mm, and 0.5 mm (n = 10/ thickness). The ceramic specimens were cemented onto a composite background (shade Dentin) using a veneer adhesive system with five colors of luting composites (RelyX). The colors of the veneer (veneer/luting/background complexes) and corresponding shade tab (A3, Vitapan) were measured using a spectrophotometer, and subsequently converted to CIE L*a*b* values. Color differences (△E) between each complex and the shade tab were calculated and analyzed with two-way ANOVA. Tukey's multiple comparisons were used to evaluate the effects of luting composites on the △E values.

Results: The means of color differences between ceramic veneers and intended shade tab were 2.50 ± 0.38, 3.17 ± 0.48, and 3.84 ± 0.63 for the 1.0 mm, 0.7 mm, and 0.5 mm thicknesses, respectively. △E values were significantly affected by the veneer thickness and the luting composite color (p < 0.001). Tukey's multiple comparison results revealed no significant differences among the luting composites in the thickness of 1.0 mm and 0.7 mm.

Conclusions: The color matching of ceramic veneers to the intended shade tab was not achieved in the 0.7 mm and 0.5 mm veneer thicknesses, whichever colors of the luting composites were used.

Keywords: CIELAB; Ceramic veneer; color difference; luting composite; shade tab.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

Substances

LinkOut - more resources