A randomized clinical trial of buprenorphine for prisoners: Findings at 12-months post-release
- PMID: 28107680
- PMCID: PMC5309171
- DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2016.11.037
A randomized clinical trial of buprenorphine for prisoners: Findings at 12-months post-release
Abstract
Background: This study examined whether starting buprenorphine treatment prior to prison and after release from prison would be associated with better drug treatment outcomes and whether males and females responded differently to the combination of in-prison treatment and post-release service setting.
Methods: Study design was a 2 (In-Prison Treatment: Condition: Buprenorphine Treatment: vs. Counseling Only)×2 [Post-Release Service Setting Condition: Opioid Treatment: Program (OTP) vs. Community Health Center (CHC)]×2 (Gender) factorial design. The trial was conducted between September 2008 and July 2012. Follow-up assessments were completed in 2014. Participants were recruited from two Baltimore pre-release prisons (one for men and one for women). Adult pre-release prisoners who were heroin-dependent during the year prior to incarceration were eligible. Post-release assessments were conducted at 1, 3, 6, and 12-month following prison release.
Results: Participants (N=211) in the in-prison treatment condition effect had a higher mean number of days of community buprenorphine treatment compared to the condition in which participants initiated medication after release (P=0.005). However, there were no statistically significant hypothesized effects for the in-prison treatment condition in terms of: days of heroin use and crime, and opioid and cocaine positive urine screening test results (all Ps>0.14) and no statistically significant hypothesized gender effects (all Ps>0.18).
Conclusions: Although initiating buprenorphine treatment in prison compared to after-release was associated with more days receiving buprenorphine treatment in the designated community treatment program during the 12-months post-release assessment, it was not associated with superior outcomes in terms of heroin and cocaine use and criminal behavior.
Keywords: Buprenorphine; Heroin addiction; Opioid substitution therapy; Prisoners.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
This study was supported by an unrestricted, unsolicited investigator initiated request from Reckitt Benckiser Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (provided study drug only) who had no role in study design; collection, analysis and interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to submit the manuscript for publication. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of this manuscript. Drs. Gordon, Kinlock, and Fitzgerald received funding from Alkermes on a prior study. Dr. Schwartz did a one-time consultation for Reckitt-Benckiser on behalf of his employer (the Friends Research Institute). Dr. O’Grady has in the past received funding for his time from Reckitt-Benckiser. Dr. Vocci has consulted with and received other funding (meals, travel expenses) from the following companies: Braeburn Pharmaceuticals, Demerx, Indivior, Pinney Associates. He has received travel and meal expenses from Intratab Labs Inc., and received consulting fees from Alkermes and Usona Institute. All of Dr. Vocci’s consulting fees go to his employer, Friends Research Institute, Inc.
Figures
1-month: Buprenorphine in prison (16/68, 23.5%) vs. Buprenorphine in the community (17/69, 24.6%); tested positive for other opioids only (n=5).
3-month: Buprenorphine in prison (21/73, 28.8%) vs. Buprenorphine in the community (25/74, 33.8%); tested positive for other opioids only (n=4).
6-month: Buprenorphine in prison (22/70, 31.4%) vs. Buprenorphine in the community (29/70, 41.4%); tested positive for other opioids only (n=5).
12-month: Buprenorphine in prison (18/61, 29.5%) vs. Buprenorphine in the community (21/63, 33.3%) tested positive for other opioids only (n=3).
1-month: 137 samples analyzed, Results missing for 74 due to: missed interview window (n=55), incarcerated (n=10), unable to locate (n=3), refused (n=3), specimen leaked/lost (n=2), detainer in another state (n=1).
3-month 147 samples analyzed. Results missing for 64 due to: missed interview window (n=33), incarcerated (n=25), unable to locate (n=3), detainer in another state (n=1), phone interview (n=1), refused (n=1)
6-month: 140 samples analyzed. Results missing for 71 due to: incarcerated (n=42), missed interview window (n=17), phone interview (n=3), unable to locate (n=3), refused (n=2), no record (n=2), medical (n=1), detainer in another state (n=1)
12-month: 124 samples analyzed. Results missing for 87 due to: incarcerated (n=79), unable to locate (n=3), phone interview (n=2), medical (n=1), detainer in another state (n=1), no record (n=1).
References
-
- Amass L, Kamien JB, Mikulich SK. Efficacy of daily and alternate-day dosing regimens with the combination buprenorphine-naloxone tablet. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2000;58:143–152. - PubMed
-
- Binswanger IA, Blatchford PJ, Lindsay RG, Stern MF. Risk factors for all-cause, overdose and early deaths after release from prison in Washington state. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2011;117:1–6. - PubMed
-
- Center for Substance Abuse Treatment (CSAT) 40, T.I.P.T.S. (Ed.) Rockville, MD: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration; 2004. Clinical Guidelines for the Use of Buprenorphine in the Treatment of Opioid Addiction. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
