Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Apr;8(2):108-118.
doi: 10.1007/s12672-017-0284-7. Epub 2017 Jan 20.

Controlling Tumor Progression with Cyclophosphamide, Vincristine, and Dacarbazine Treatment Improves Survival in Patients with Metastatic and Unresectable Malignant Pheochromocytomas/Paragangliomas

Affiliations

Controlling Tumor Progression with Cyclophosphamide, Vincristine, and Dacarbazine Treatment Improves Survival in Patients with Metastatic and Unresectable Malignant Pheochromocytomas/Paragangliomas

Shiko Asai et al. Horm Cancer. 2017 Apr.

Abstract

Evidence has not been established to support that combination chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide, vincristine, and dacarbazine (CVD) improves survival in patients with malignant pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma (M-PPGL). To investigate the efficacy of CVD for this disease, we retrospectively analyzed data of 23 patients with metastatic and unresectable M-PPGL (mean age, 41.7 ± 15.4 years) who received at least 2 cycles of this regimen. The follow-up period after initiation of CVD ranged from 0.3 to 13.7 years, with a median of 3.3 years. CVD therapy achieved a complete tumor response (CR) in 1 patient (4%), a partial response (PR) in 5 (22%), stable disease (SD) in 5 (22%), and progressive disease (PD) in 13 (52%), respectively. All of the responders (CR and PR) but 6% of the non-responders (SD and PD) showed substantial biochemical improvement. The progression-free survival period in the responders was significantly longer than in the non-responders (p < 0.01). Although the overall survival and survival after the diagnosis of M-PPGL were longer in the responders than the non-responders, the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.08). The progression-free and overall survival period were significantly longer in the non-progression group (CR, PR, and SD) than in the progression group (PD) (1.7 ± 3.3 vs. 0.3 ± 0.3 years, p < 0.01, and 4.6 ± 3.6 vs. 2.0 ± 3.7 years, p = 0.01, respectively). It is therefore suggested that CVD chemotherapy could be useful in controlling tumor progression and improving survival in patients with metastatic and progressive M-PPGL.

Keywords: Antineoplastic combined chemotherapy; CVD therapy; Malignant pheochromocytoma; Myelodysplastic syndromes; Paraganglioma; Survival time.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Kaplan–Meier survival curves in the non-progression and progression groups. a Progression-free survival (PFS). b Overall survival (OS). The PFS and OS in the non-progression group (solid lines; PFS, 1.7 ± 3.3 years; OS, 4.6 ± 3.6 years) were significantly longer than in the progression group (dashed lines; PFS, 0.3 ± 0.3 years; OS, 2.0 ± 3.7 years), as determined by Kaplan–Meier analysis with the log-rank test (χ 2 = 16.81; p < 0.001, and χ 2 = 6.16; p = 0.01, respectively)
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Kaplan–Meier survival curves in the non-progression and progression groups for a the survival since the first diagnosis of pheochromocytoma/paraganglioma (time after Dx of PPGL) and b since the first diagnosis of metastases (time after Dx of M-PPGL). The durations from the first diagnoses of pheochromocytoma/paraganglioma and malignant disease until follow-up in the non-progression group (solid lines; time after Dx of PPGL, 15.3 ± 7.6 years; time after Dx of M-PPGL, 8.1 ± 4.4 years) were significantly longer than in the progression group (dashed line; time after Dx of PPGL, 5.9 ± 4.1 years; time after Dx of M-PPGL, 2.9 ± 3.6 years), as determined by Kaplan–Meier analysis with the log-rank test (χ 2 = 10.04; p < 0.01, and χ 2 = 5.49; p = 0.02, respectively)

References

    1. Chrisoulidou A, Kaltsas G, Ilias I, Grossman AB. The diagnosis and management of malignant phaeochromocytoma and paraganglioma. Endocr Relat Cancer. 2007;14:569–585. doi: 10.1677/ERC-07-0074. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Eisenhofer G, Bornstein SR, Brouwers FM, Cheung NK, Dahia PL, de Krijger RR, Giordano TJ, Greene LA, Goldstein DS, Lehnert H, Manger WM, Maris JM, Neumann HP, Pacak K, Shulkin BL, Smith DI, Tischler AS, Young WF., Jr Malignant pheochromocytoma: current status and initiatives for future progress. Endocr Relat Cancer. 2004;11:423–436. doi: 10.1677/erc.1.00829. - DOI - PubMed
    1. van Hulsteijn LT, Niemeijer ND, Dekkers OM, Corssmit EP. (131)I-MIBG therapy for malignant paraganglioma and phaeochromocytoma: systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Endocrinol. 2014;80:487–501. doi: 10.1111/cen.12341. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Keiser HR, Goldstein DS, Wade JL, Douglas FL, Averbuch SD. Treatment of malignant pheochromocytoma with combination chemotherapy. Hypertension. 1985;7:I18–I24. doi: 10.1161/01.HYP.7.3_Pt_2.I18. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Plouin PF, Fitzgerald P, Rich T, Ayala-Ramirez M, Perrier ND, Baudin E, Jimenez C. Metastatic pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma: focus on therapeutics. Horm Metab Res. 2012;44:390–399. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1299707. - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms