Investigation of the Er: YAG laser and diamond bur cavity preparation on the marginal microleakage of Class V cavities restored with different flowable composites
- PMID: 28112852
- DOI: 10.1002/jemt.22827
Investigation of the Er: YAG laser and diamond bur cavity preparation on the marginal microleakage of Class V cavities restored with different flowable composites
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficiency of the Er:YAG laser and diamond bur cavity preparation on the marginal microleakage of Class V cavities. Group 1: bur preparation (bp) + Vertise Flow (VF); Group 2: laser preparation (lp) + VF; Group 3: bp + Adper Easy One (AEO) + Filtek Ultimate Flowable Composite (FUFC); Group 4: lp + AEO + FUFC; Group 5: bp + Clearfil S3 Bond (CSB) + Clearfil Majesty Flow (CMF); Group 6: lp + CSB + CMF. Data were analyzed by Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U tests (p < .05). More microleakage was observed in cervical regions compared to occlusal regions in all groups (p < .05). No significant difference was observed among all groups in terms of occlusal and cervical surfaces, respectively (p > .05). The use of the Er:YAG laser for cavity preparation with different adhesive systems and flowable composites did not influence microleakage.
Keywords: Class V cavity; Er:YAG laser; microleakage; self-adhering flowable composite.
© 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Similar articles
-
Comparison of total-etch, self-etch, and selective etching techniques on class V composite restorations prepared by Er:YAG laser and bur: a scanning electron microscopy study.Microsc Res Tech. 2016 Oct;79(10):998-1004. doi: 10.1002/jemt.22735. Epub 2016 Jul 29. Microsc Res Tech. 2016. PMID: 27472905
-
The effects of cavity-filling techniques on microleakage in class II resin restorations prepared with Er:YAG laser and diamond bur: A scanning electron microscopy study.Scanning. 2016 Sep;38(5):389-395. doi: 10.1002/sca.21282. Epub 2015 Nov 5. Scanning. 2016. PMID: 26538487
-
Leakage pathway of different nano-restorative materials in class V cavities prepared by Er:YAG laser and bur preparation.Photomed Laser Surg. 2009 Oct;27(5):783-9. doi: 10.1089/pho.2008.2313. Photomed Laser Surg. 2009. PMID: 19754249
-
Microleakage of class V cavities with different adhesive systems prepared by a diamond instrument and different parameters of Er:YAG laser irradiation.Photomed Laser Surg. 2008 Dec;26(6):585-91. doi: 10.1089/pho.2007.2203. Photomed Laser Surg. 2008. PMID: 19099387
-
Effect of different parameters of Er:YAG laser irradiations on class V composite restorations: A scanning electron microscopy study.Scanning. 2016 Sep;38(5):434-441. doi: 10.1002/sca.21292. Epub 2016 Jan 11. Scanning. 2016. PMID: 26750663
Cited by
-
Effects of Er:YAG and Er,Cr:YSGG laser irradiation and adhesive systems on microtensile bond strength of a self-adhering composite.Lasers Med Sci. 2023 Jan 18;38(1):41. doi: 10.1007/s10103-022-03663-4. Lasers Med Sci. 2023. PMID: 36652020
-
Er:YAG laser application in caries removal and cavity preparation in children: a meta-analysis.Lasers Med Sci. 2019 Mar;34(2):273-280. doi: 10.1007/s10103-018-2582-x. Epub 2018 Jul 12. Lasers Med Sci. 2019. PMID: 30003427
-
Effect of chitosan and CMCS on dentin after Er:YAG laser irradiation: shear bond strength and surface morphology analysis.BMC Oral Health. 2024 Mar 29;24(1):402. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-04097-w. BMC Oral Health. 2024. PMID: 38553692 Free PMC article.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources