Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Jun;17(3):184-191.
doi: 10.1097/ANC.0000000000000382.

A Quality Improvement Collaborative Program for Neonatal Pain Management in Japan

Affiliations

A Quality Improvement Collaborative Program for Neonatal Pain Management in Japan

Mio Ozawa et al. Adv Neonatal Care. 2017 Jun.

Abstract

Background: Neonatal pain management guidelines have been released; however, there is insufficient systematic institutional support for the adoption of evidence-based pain management in Japan.

Purpose: To evaluate the impact of a collaborative quality improvement program on the implementation of pain management improvements in Japanese neonatal intensive care units (NICUs).

Methods: Seven Japanese level III NICUs participated in a neonatal pain management quality improvement program based on an Institute for Healthcare Improvement collaborative model. The NICUs developed evidence-based practice points for pain management and implemented these over a 12-month period. Changes were introduced through a series of Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles, and throughout the process, pain management quality indicators were tracked as performance measures. Jonckheere's trend test and the Cochran-Armitage test for trend were used to examine the changes in quality indicator implementations over time (baseline, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months).

Findings: Baseline pain management data from the 7 sites revealed substantial opportunities for improvement of pain management, and testing changes in the NICU setting resulted in measurable improvements in pain management. During the intervention phase, all participating sites introduced new pain assessment tools, and all sites developed electronic medical record forms to capture pain score, interventions, and infant responses to interventions.

Implications for practice: The use of collaborative quality improvement techniques played a key role in improving pain management in the NICUs.

Implications for research: Collaborative improvement programs provide an attractive strategy for solving evidence-practice gaps in the NICU setting.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. American Academy of Pediatrics; Committee on Fetus and Newborn and Section on Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine. Prevention and management of procedural pain in the neonate: an update. Pediatrics. 2016;137(2):e20154271. - PubMed
    1. Lago P, Garetti E, Merazzi D, et al. Guidelines for procedural pain in the newborn. Acta Paediatr. 2009;98(6):932–939. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Association of Paediatric Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland. Good practice in postoperative and procedural pain management, 2nd edition. Paediatr Anaesth. 2012;22(suppl 1):S1–S79. - PubMed
    1. Committee for the Establishment and Dissemination of the Japanese Guideline for Pain Prevention and Management in the NICU. [Japanese Guideline for Pain Prevention and Management] [Internet]. Tokyo, Japan: Committee for the Establishment and Dissemination of the Japanese Guideline for Pain Prevention and Management in the NICU; 2014. In Japanese. http://www.jspnm.com/topics/data/kaiin20150128.pdf. Accessed Jan 5, 2017.
    1. Stevens B, Riahi S, Cardoso R, et al. The influence of context on pain practices in the NICU: perceptions of health care professionals. Qual Health Res. 2011;21(6):757–770. - PubMed