Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2017 Jan 23;14(1):14.
doi: 10.1186/s12978-017-0278-5.

Are men well served by family planning programs?

Affiliations
Review

Are men well served by family planning programs?

Karen Hardee et al. Reprod Health. .

Abstract

Although the range of contraceptives includes methods for men, namely condoms, vasectomy and withdrawal that men use directly, and the Standard Days Method (SDM) that requires their participation, family planning programming has primarily focused on women. What is known about reaching men as contraceptive users? This paper draws from a review of 47 interventions that reached men and proposes 10 key considerations for strengthening programming for men as contraceptive users. A review of programming shows that men and boys are not particularly well served by programs. Most programs operate from the perspective that women are contraceptive users and that men should support their partners, with insufficient attention to reaching men as contraceptive users in their own right. The notion that family planning is women's business only is outdated. There is sufficient evidence demonstrating men's desire for information and services, as well as men's positive response to existing programming to warrant further programming for men as FP users. The key considerations focus on getting information and services where men and boys need it; addressing gender norms that affect men's attitudes and use while respecting women's autonomy; reaching adolescent boys; including men as users in policies and guidelines; scaling up successful programming; filling gaps with implementation research and monitoring & evaluation; and creating more contraceptive options for men.

Keywords: Contraceptive use; Family planning; Male contraceptive users; Male engagement; Men.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ringheim K. Revising the downward trend in men’s share of contraceptive use. Reprod Health Matter. 1999;7(9):83–96. doi: 10.1016/S0968-8080(99)90009-5. - DOI
    1. Boender C, Santana D, Santillán D, Hardee K, Greene ME, Schuler S. The ‘so what?’ report: A look at whether integrating a gender focus into programs makes a difference to outcomes. Washington: Interagency Gender Working Group; 2004.
    1. Wentzell EA, Inhorn MC. Reconceiving masculinity and ‘men as partners’ for ICPD beyond 2014: insights from a Mexican HPV study. Glob Public Health. 2014;9(6):691–705. doi: 10.1080/17441692.2014.917690. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Interagency Gender Working Group (IGWG) Engaging men for gender equality and improved reproductive health. Washington: IGWG; 2009.
    1. Rottach E, Schuler SR, Hardee K. Gender perspectives improve reproductive health outcomes: new Eevidence. Washington: The Interagency Gender Working Group; 2009.