Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2016:2016:6829875.
doi: 10.1155/2016/6829875. Epub 2016 Dec 28.

Prostate Cancer Radiation Therapy: What Do Clinicians Have to Know?

Affiliations
Review

Prostate Cancer Radiation Therapy: What Do Clinicians Have to Know?

Ben G L Vanneste et al. Biomed Res Int. 2016.

Abstract

Radiotherapy (RT) for prostate cancer (PC) has steadily evolved over the last decades, with improving biochemical disease-free survival. Recently population based research also revealed an association between overall survival and doses ≥ 75.6 Gray (Gy) in men with intermediate- and high-risk PC. Examples of improved RT techniques are image-guided RT, intensity-modulated RT, volumetric modulated arc therapy, and stereotactic ablative body RT, which could facilitate further dose escalation. Brachytherapy is an internal form of RT that also developed substantially. New devices such as rectum spacers and balloons have been developed to spare rectal structures. Newer techniques like protons and carbon ions have the intrinsic characteristics maximising the dose on the tumour while minimising the effect on the surrounding healthy tissue, but clinical data are needed for confirmation in randomised phase III trials. Furthermore, it provides an overview of an important discussion issue in PC treatment between urologists and radiation oncologists: the comparison between radical prostatectomy and RT. Current literature reveals that all possible treatment modalities have the same cure rate, but a different toxicity pattern. We recommend proposing the possible different treatment modalities with their own advantages and side-effects to the individual patient. Clinicians and patients should make treatment decisions together (shared decision-making) while using patient decision aids.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Overview of an EBRT procedure.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Examples of dose distribution of a 3DCRT, IMRT-5, VMAT, PSPT, IMPT, and a BT treatment plan calculated on the same patient. The red surface represents the high-dose regions, the yellow surface the intermediate-high-dose regions, the dark blue surface the low-dose regions, and the azure blue surface the intermediate-dose regions. 3D-CRT: 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy; IMRT: intensity modulated radiotherapy; VMAT: volumetric modulated arc therapy; PSPT: passively scattered proton therapy; IMPT: intensity modulated proton therapy; BT: brachytherapy.
Figure 3
Figure 3
The Bragg peak demonstrating the plots energy loss of ionising radiation during its travel through the body. Maximum energy deposition at the target area (tumour) without energy loss after the target (healthy organs).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Axial T2-weighted magnetic resonance images of a patient with a hydrogel spacer before injection (a) and after injection (b).
Figure 5
Figure 5
A summary of some screen shots of an interactive PDA for PC (http://www.treatmentchoice.info/). The PDA provides information to the patient of the characteristics of his disease, the available treatments for his own situation, his individual preferences, and a comparison of the possible treatments. It offers a summarised advice based upon the information provided by the patient. The purpose of this is to inform the patient; a final decision is always taken together with the clinician.

References

    1. Ferlay J., Steliarova-Foucher E., Lortet-Tieulent J., et al. Cancer incidence and mortality patterns in Europe: estimates for 40 countries in 2012. European Journal of Cancer. 2013;49(6):1374–1403. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2012.12.027. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ferlay J., Soerjomataram I., Dikshit R., et al. Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012. International Journal of Cancer. 2015;136(5):E359–E386. doi: 10.1002/ijc.29210. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lifetime risk was calculated by the Statistical Information Team at Cancer Research UK. 2012, http://www.cancerresearchuk.org/health-professional/cancer-statistics/st....
    1. Heidenreich A., Bastian P. J., Bellmunt J., et al. EAU guidelines on prostate cancer. Part 1: screening, diagnosis, and local treatment with curative intent—update 2013. European Urology. 2014;65(1):124–137. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.09.046. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Peeters S. T. H., Heemsbergen W. D., Koper P. C. M., et al. Dose-response in radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer: results of the Dutch multicenter randomized phase III trial comparing 68 Gy of radiotherapy with 78 Gy. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2006;24(13):1990–1996. doi: 10.1200/jco.2005.05.2530. - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources