Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Feb;156(2):299-304.
doi: 10.1177/0194599816683377. Epub 2017 Jan 24.

Patient Reflections on Decision Making for Laryngeal Cancer Treatment

Andrew G Shuman  1   2   3 , Knoll Larkin  3 , Dorothy Thomas  1 , Frank L Palmer  1 , Joseph J Fins  2 , Shrujal S Baxi  4 , Nancy Lee  5 , Jatin P Shah  1 , Angela Fagerlin  3   6   7 , Snehal G Patel  1
Affiliations

Patient Reflections on Decision Making for Laryngeal Cancer Treatment

Andrew G Shuman et al. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2017 Feb.

Abstract

Objective To describe the reflections of patients treated for laryngeal cancer with regard to treatment-related decision making. Study Design Cross-sectional survey-based pilot study. Setting Single-institution tertiary care cancer center. Subjects/Methods Adults with laryngeal carcinoma were eligible to participate (N = 57; 46% treated surgically, 54% nonsurgically). Validated surveys measuring decisional conflict and regret explored patients' reflections on their preferences and priorities regarding treatment-related decision making for laryngeal cancer and how patient-reported functional outcomes, professional referral patterns, and desired provider input influenced these reflections. Results When considering the level of involvement of surgeons, radiation oncologists, and medical oncologists in their care, patients were more likely to believe that the specialist whom they saw first was the most important factor in deciding how to treat their cancer (Fisher's exact, ~χ2 = 16.2, df = 6, P = .02). Patients who were treated for laryngeal cancer who reported worse voice-related quality of life recalled more decisional conflict ( P = .01) and experienced more decisional regret ( P < .001). Of the patients for whom speech was a top priority prior to treatment, better voice-related quality of life overall scores were correlated with less decision regret about treatment decisions ( P < .02). Of the patients for whom eating and drinking were top priorities prior to treatment, better MD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory global scores were correlated with less decision regret about treatment decisions ( P < .002). Conclusion Patient priorities and attitudes, coupled with functional outcomes and professional referral patterns, influence how patients reflect on their choices regarding management of laryngeal cancer. Better understanding of these variables may assist in ensuring that patients' voices are integrated into individualized laryngeal cancer treatment planning.

Keywords: larynx cancer; patient-reported outcomes; quality of life; shared decision making.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Department of Veterans Affairs Laryngeal Cancer Study Group. Induction chemotherapy plus radiation compared with surgery plus radiation in patients with advanced laryngeal cancer. N Engl J Med. 1991;324:1685–1690. - PubMed
    1. Mendenhall WM, Werning JW, Hinerman RW, Amdur RJ, Villaret DB. Management of T1–T2 glottic carcinomas. Cancer. 2004;100:1786–1792. - PubMed
    1. Genden EM, Ferlito A, Rinaldo A, et al. Recent changes in the treatment of patients with advanced laryngeal cancer. Head Neck. 2008;30:103–110. - PubMed
    1. Silver CE, Beitler JJ, Shaha AR, Rinaldo A, Ferlito A. Current trends in initial management of laryngeal cancer: the declining use of open surgery. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2009;266:1333–1352. - PubMed
    1. National Comprehensive Cancer Network. The Complete Library of NCCN Oncology Practice Guidelines. Rockledge, PA: National Comprehensive Cancer Network; 2000.

Publication types