Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Jan 24:7:41151.
doi: 10.1038/srep41151.

Highly Sensitive Marker Panel for Guidance in Lung Cancer Rapid Diagnostic Units

Affiliations

Highly Sensitive Marker Panel for Guidance in Lung Cancer Rapid Diagnostic Units

Sonia Blanco-Prieto et al. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

While evidence for lung cancer screening implementation in Europe is awaited, Rapid Diagnostic Units have been established in many hospitals to accelerate the early diagnosis of lung cancer. We seek to develop an algorithm to detect lung cancer in a symptomatic population attending such unit, based on a sensitive serum marker panel. Serum concentrations of Epidermal Growth Factor, sCD26, Calprotectin, Matrix Metalloproteinases -1, -7, -9, CEA and CYFRA 21.1 were determined in 140 patients with respiratory symptoms (lung cancer and controls with/without benign pathology). Logistic Lasso regression was performed to derive a lung cancer prediction model, and the resulting algorithm was tested in a validation set. A classification rule based on EGF, sCD26, Calprotectin and CEA was established, able to reasonably discriminate lung cancer with 97% sensitivity and 43% specificity in the training set, and 91.7% sensitivity and 45.4% specificity in the validation set. Overall, the panel identified with high sensitivity stage I non-small cell lung cancer (94.7%) and 100% small-cell lung cancers. Our study provides a sensitive 4-marker classification algorithm for lung cancer detection to aid in the management of suspicious lung cancer patients in the context of Rapid Diagnostic Units.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. ROC Curve Analysis for Lung Cancer Prediction in the Training Set.
ROC curves are shown for each individual marker included in the classification algorithm, together with the clinical model and the 4-marker panel derived from logistic Lasso regression. Training set included 68 lung cancer cases and 72 controls (36 healthy and 36 benign respiratory pathologies).

References

    1. Torre L. A. et al.. Global cancer statistics, 2012. C.A. Cancer J. Clin. 65, 87–108 (2015). - PubMed
    1. Francisci S. et al.. Survival patterns in lung and pleural cancer in Europe 1999–2007: Results from the EUROCARE-5 study. Eur. J. Cancer. 51, 2242–2253 (2015). - PubMed
    1. Walters S. et al.. Lung cancer survival and stage at diagnosis in Australia, Canada, Denmark, Norway, Sweden and the UK: a population-based study, 2004–2007. Thorax. 68, 551–564 (2013). - PubMed
    1. Doseeva V., Colpitts T., Gao G., Woodcock J. & Knezevic V. Performance of a multiplexed dual analyte immunoassay for the early detection of non-small cell lung cancer. J. Transl. Med. 13, 55 (2015). - PMC - PubMed
    1. U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Final recommendation statement: lung cancer: screening. U.S. Preventive Services Task Force http://www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/Page/Document/Recommendatio... (2013).

Publication types

Substances