Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Jan 21;9(1):81.
doi: 10.3390/nu9010081.

Prevalence of Self-Reported Gluten Sensitivity and Adherence to a Gluten-Free Diet in Argentinian Adult Population

Affiliations

Prevalence of Self-Reported Gluten Sensitivity and Adherence to a Gluten-Free Diet in Argentinian Adult Population

Francisco Cabrera-Chávez et al. Nutrients. .

Abstract

Background: Previous studies suggest that the prevalence of wheat/gluten sensitivity and adherence to a gluten-free diet (GFD) are high in Latin population despite a poor diagnosis of celiac disease. However, these prevalence rates still remain unknown in most Latin American countries.

Methods: A cross-sectional survey study was conducted in Santa Fe, Argentina.

Results: The estimated self-reported prevalence rates were (95% Confidence Interval [CI]): self-reported gluten sensitivity (SR-GS) 7.61% (6.2-9.2), SR-GS currently following a GFD 1.82% (1.2-2.7), celiac disease 0.58% (0.3-1.2), wheat allergy 0.33% (0.12-0.84), self-reported non-celiac gluten sensitivity (SR-NCGS) 6.28% (5.1-7.8), SR-NCGS currently following a GFD 0.91% (0.5-1.6), and adherence to a GFD 6.37% (5.1-7.9). SR-GS was more common in women (6.0%; p < 0.001) and associated with irritable bowel syndrome (p < 0.001). Among the GFD followers, 71.4% were doing it for reasons other than health-related benefits and 50.6% without medical/dietitian advice. In the non-SR-GS group, the main motivations for following a GFD were weight control and the perception that a GFD is healthier.

Conclusion: In Argentina, gluten sensitivity is commonly reported and it seems that physicians/gastroenterologists are aware of celiac disease diagnosis. Trustable information about the benefits and potential consequences of following a GFD should be given to the general population.

Keywords: celiac disease; gluten; non-celiac gluten sensitivity; non-celiac wheat sensitivity; prevalence; wheat allergy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

All authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Characteristics of respondents following a GFD. SR: self-reported; SR-NCGS: self-reported non-celiac gluten sensitivity; Non-SR-GS: non self-reported gluten sensitivity; SR-PD: self-reported physician-diagnosed. (AC) SR-celiac disease, SR-wheat allergy and SR-NCGS cases either following a GFD or not. Only those cases that reported adherence to a GFD were considered for prevalence rates estimations.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Prevalence of adherence to a GFD and avoidance of wheat/gluten-containing foods stratified by age (years). ** p < 0.01.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Recurrent self-reported symptoms in SR-GS cases.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Motivations for following a GFD or avoiding wheat/gluten-containing foods and who instructs the GFD: (A) SR-GS individuals currently following a GFD; and (B) SR-GS individuals currently avoiding wheat/gluten-containing foods. In Figure 4A,B, in addition to the symptoms triggered by gluten intake, 11 and 6 individuals reported other motivations for following a GFD or avoiding wheat/gluten-containing foods, respectively; (C) Non-SR-GS individuals currently following a GFD; and (D) non-SR-GS individuals currently avoiding wheat/gluten-containing foods. In Figure 4C,D, 1 and 12 individuals reported non-recurrent adverse reactions to gluten intake as the motivation for following a GFD.

References

    1. Catassi C., Bai J.C., Bonaz B., Bouma G., Calabrò A., Carroccio A., Castillejo G., Ciacci C., Cristofori F., Dolinsek J. Non-celiac gluten sensitivity: The new frontier of gluten related disorders. Nutrients. 2013;5:3839–3853. doi: 10.3390/nu5103839. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sapone A., Bai J.C., Ciacci C., Dolinsek J., Green P.H., Hadjivassiliou M., Kaukinen K., Rostami K., Sanders D.S., Schumann M. Spectrum of gluten-related disorders: Consensus on new nomenclature and classification. BMC Med. 2012;10:13. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-10-13. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gujral N.F., Hugh J., Thomson A.B.R. Celiac disease: Prevalence, diagnosism pathogenesis and tratment. World J. Gastroenterol. 2012;18:6036–6059. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i42.6036. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Zuidmeer L., Goldhahn K., Rona R.J., Gislason D., Madsen C., Summers C., Sodergren E., Dahlstrom J., Lindner T., Sigurdardottir S.T. The prevalence of plant food allergies: A systematic review. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2008;121:1210–1218. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2008.02.019. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ontiveros N., Hardy M., Cabrera-Chavez F. Assessing of celiac disease and nonceliac gluten sensitivity. Gastroenterol. Res. Pract. 2015;2015:723954. doi: 10.1155/2015/723954. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms