Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Jan 24;17(1):77.
doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1975-4.

Quality of care in the intensive care unit from the perspective of patient's relatives: development and psychometric evaluation of the consumer quality index 'R-ICU'

Ans Rensen  1 , Margo M van Mol  2 , Ilse Menheere  3 , Marjan D Nijkamp  4 , Ellen Verhoogt  5 , Bea Maris  6 , Willeke Manders  3 , Lilian Vloet  3   7 , Lisbeth Verharen  3
Affiliations

Quality of care in the intensive care unit from the perspective of patient's relatives: development and psychometric evaluation of the consumer quality index 'R-ICU'

Ans Rensen et al. BMC Health Serv Res. .

Abstract

Background: The quality standards of the Dutch Society of Intensive Care require monitoring of the satisfaction of patient's relatives with respect to care. Currently, no suitable instrument is available in the Netherlands to measure this. This study describes the development and psychometric evaluation of the questionnaire-based Consumer Quality Index 'Relatives in Intensive Care Unit' (CQI 'R-ICU'). The CQI 'R-ICU' measures the perceived quality of care from the perspective of patients' relatives, and identifies aspects of care that need improvement.

Methods: The CQI 'R-ICU' was developed using a mixed method design. Items were based on quality of care aspects from earlier studies and from focus group interviews with patients' relatives. The time period for the data collection of the psychometric evaluation was from October 2011 until July 2012. Relatives of adult intensive care patients in one university hospital and five general hospitals in the Netherlands were approached to participate. Psychometric evaluation included item analysis, inter-item analysis, and factor analysis.

Results: Twelve aspects were noted as being indicators of quality of care, and were subsequently selected for the questionnaire's vocabulary. The response rate of patients' relatives was 81% (n = 455). Quality of care was represented by two clusters, each showing a high reliability: 'Communication' (α = .80) and 'Participation' (α = .84). Relatives ranked the following aspects for quality of care as most important: no conflicting information, information from doctors and nurses is comprehensive, and health professionals take patients' relatives seriously. The least important care aspects were: need for contact with peers, nuisance, and contact with a spiritual counsellor. Aspects that needed the most urgent improvement (highest quality improvement scores) were: information about how relatives can contribute to the care of the patient, information about the use of meal-facilities in the hospital, and involvement in decision-making on the medical treatment of the patient.

Conclusions: The CQI 'R-ICU' evaluates quality of care from the perspective of relatives of intensive care patients and provides practical information for quality assurance and improvement programs. The development and psychometric evaluation of the CQI 'R-ICU' led to a draft questionnaire, sufficient to justify further research into the reliability, validity, and the discriminative power of the questionnaire.

Keywords: Consumer quality index; Consumer satisfaction; Family member; Intensive care unit; Quality of healthcare; Relative.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
CQI ‘R-ICU’development process
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Davidson JE, Powers K, Hedayat KM, Tieszen M, Kon AA, Shepard E, et al. Clinical practice guidelines for support of the family in the patient-centered intensive care unit: American College of Critical Care Medicine Task Force 2004–2005. Crit Care Med. 2007;35(2):605–22. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000254067.14607.EB. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kaljouw M. Behoeften van familieleden van intensive care patiënten (Needs of family members of patients in the ICU) Maastricht: proefschrift; 1998.
    1. Verharen L, Mintjes J, Kaljouw M, Melief W, Schilder L, van der Laan G. Psychosocial needs of relatives of trauma patients, health & social work. 2015. - PubMed
    1. Söderstrom IK, Saveman B, Hagberg MS, Benzein E. Family adaptation in relation to a family member’s stay in ICU. Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2009;25:250–7. doi: 10.1016/j.iccn.2009.06.006. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Needham DM, Davidson J, Cohen H, Hopkins RO, Weinert C, Wunsch H, et al. Improving long-term outcomes after discharge from intensive care unit: report from a stakeholders’ conference. Crit Care Med. 2012;40(2):502–9. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e318232da75. - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms