Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Jan 24;14(1):12.
doi: 10.1186/s12985-016-0679-z.

TLR2 2258 G>A single nucleotide polymorphism and the risk of congenital infection with human cytomegalovirus

Affiliations

TLR2 2258 G>A single nucleotide polymorphism and the risk of congenital infection with human cytomegalovirus

Wioletta Wujcicka et al. Virol J. .

Abstract

Background: Human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) is responsible for the most common intrauterine infections, which may be acquired congenitally from infected pregnant woman to fetus. The research was aimed to estimate the role of three single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) located in TLR2 gene, and the common contribution of TLR2, and previously studied TLR4 and TLR9 SNPs, to the occurrence of congenital HCMV infection in fetuses and newborns.

Methods: The study was performed in 20 Polish fetuses and newborns, congenitally infected with HCMV, and in 31 uninfected controls, as well as with participation of pregnant women, the mothers of 16 infected and 14 uninfected offsprings. Genotypes in TLR2 SNPs were determined, using self-designed nested PCR-RFLP assays, and confirmed by sequencing. The genotypes were tested for Hardy-Weinberg (H-W) equilibrium, and for their relationship with the development of congenital cytomegaly, using a logistic regression model. The common influence of TLR2, TLR4 and TLR9 SNPs on the occurrence of congenital disease was estimated by multiple-SNP analysis.

Results: Distribution of the genotypes and alleles in TLR2 1350 T>C and 2029 C>T SNPs was similar between the studied groups of fetuses and neonates. In case of 2258 G>A polymorphism, the GA heterozygotic status was significantly more frequent in the infected cases than among the uninfected individuals (25.0% vs. 3.2%, respectively), and increased the risk of HCMV infection (OR 10.00, 95% CI 1.07-93.44; P ≤ 0.050). Similarly, the A allele within 2258 G>A polymorphism was significantly more frequent among the infected offsprings than in the uninfected ones (12.5% vs. 1.6%; P ≤ 0.050). Complex AA variants for both TLR2 2258 and TLR9 2848 G>A polymorphisms, were estimated to be at increased risk of congenital HCMV infection (OR 11.58, 95% CI 1.19-112.59; P ≤ 0.050). Additionally, significant relationships were observed between the occurrence of complex AA or GA variants for both TLR2 and TLR9 SNPs and the increased viral loads, determined in fetal amniotic fluids and in maternal blood or urine specimens (P ≤ 0.050).

Conclusions: Among various TLR2, TLR4 and TLR9 polymorphisms, TLR2 2258 G>A SNP seems to be an important factor associated with increased risk of congenital HCMV infection in Polish fetuses and neonates.

Keywords: Congenital cytomegaly; Human cytomegalovirus (HCMV); Pregnancy; Single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP); Toll-like receptor 2 (TLR2).

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
PCR-RFLP profiles for TLR2 1350 T>C (a), and 2029 C>T and 2258 G>A (b) SNPs. RFLP products were separated in 2% agarose gels, stained with ethidium bromide. The numbers on the right side of electropherograms show the lengths of resolved DNA fragments. M – 50 bp DNA marker; Ud – undigested PCR product; CC, GG, GA, TC, and TT – genotypes in analyzed TLR2 SNPs
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Chromatograms comprising TLR2 1350 T>C (a, b), 2029 C>T (c), and 2258 G>A (d, e). The genotypes in TLR2 SNPs were determined for the forward strand sequences. CC, GG, GA, TC, and TT – genotypes in described SNPs

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Britt W. Cytomegalovirus. In: Remington JS, Klein JO, editors. Infectious diseases of the fetus and newborn infant. 7. Philadelphia: Elsevier Saunders; 2011. pp. 707–56.
    1. Cannon MJ. Congenital cytomegalovirus (CMV) epidemiology and awareness. J Clin Virol. 2009;46(Suppl):S6–10. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2009.09.002. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cordier AG, Guitton S, Vauloup-Fellous C, Grangeot-Keros L, Benachi A, Picone O. Awareness and knowledge of congenital cytomegalovirus infection among health care providers in France. J Clin Virol. 2012;55:158–63. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2012.06.022. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gaj Z, Rycel M, Wilczyński J, Nowakowska D. Seroprevalence of cytomegalovirus infection in the population of Polish pregnant women. Ginekol Pol. 2012;83:337–41. - PubMed
    1. Paradowska E, Studzińska M, Nowakowska D, Wilczyński J, Rycel M, Suski P, et al. Distribution of UL144, US28 and UL55 genotypes in Polish newborns with congenital cytomegalovirus infections. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2012;31:1335–45. doi: 10.1007/s10096-011-1447-z. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types