Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2017 Mar;21(3):171-177.
doi: 10.1089/gtmb.2016.0407. Epub 2017 Jan 25.

Confidentiality in Biobanking Research: A Comparison of Donor and Nondonor Families' Understanding of Risks

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Confidentiality in Biobanking Research: A Comparison of Donor and Nondonor Families' Understanding of Risks

Laura A Siminoff et al. Genet Test Mol Biomarkers. 2017 Mar.

Abstract

Aims: Confidentiality of personal identifiers potentially linking the genetic results from biobanking participants back to the donor and donor relatives is a concern. The risks associated with a breach of confidentiality should be ascertained when biobanks collect samples requiring the consent of a family decision maker (FDM) from deceased organ and tissue donors. This article explores FDM knowledge and opinions regarding risks associated with participation in biobanking research in the context of the Genotype-Tissue Expression (GTEx) Project.

Methods: Data collection included a survey completed by organ procurement organization requesters (n = 37) and semistructured telephone interviews with the FDMs (n = 85).

Results: Donor families were more likely to know that there was a risk that a patient's identity could be revealed through a breach of confidentiality (p < 0.05). They also were more likely to understand that researchers using biobanked tissue would not have access to the patient's exact identity (p < 0.05). FDMs who refused donation were more concerned about risks than donors and reported lower levels of support for medical research in general. Finally, families were frequently interested in the return of results and willing to trade absolute confidentiality for participation.

Conclusions: Clear discussion of the risk of breach of confidentiality is needed during the consent process. The risk and benefit equation could be equalized if studies such as GTEx offered genomic results to interested participants.

Keywords: biobanking; genomic research; informed consent; tissue donation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

No competing financial interests exist.

References

    1. Berg J, Khoury M, Evans J. (2011) Deploying whole genome sequencing in clinical practice and public health: meeting the challenge one bin at a time. Genet Med 13:499–504 - PubMed
    1. Bledsoe MJ, Grizzle WE, Clark BJ, et al. (2012) Practical implementation issues and challenges for biobanks in the return of individual research results. Genet Med 14:478–483 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Brothers KB, Morrison DR, Clayton EW. (2011) Two large-scale surveys on community attitudes toward an opt-out biobank. Am J Med Genet A 155A:2982–2990 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chan B, Facio FM, Eidem H, et al. (2012) Genomic inheritances: disclosing individual research results from whole-exome sequencing to deceased participants' relatives. Am J Bioeth 12:1–8 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Clayton EW, McGuire AL. (2012) The legal risks of returning results of genomics research. Genet Med 14:473–477 - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources