Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Feb;139(2):287-294.
doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000002950.

Prepectoral Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction: Rationale, Indications, and Preliminary Results

Steven Sigalove  1   2 , G Patrick Maxwell  1   2 , Noemi M Sigalove  1   2 , Toni L Storm-Dickerson  1   2 , Nicole Pope  1   2 , Jami Rice  1   2 , Allen Gabriel  1   2
Affiliations

Prepectoral Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction: Rationale, Indications, and Preliminary Results

Steven Sigalove et al. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017 Feb.

Abstract

Implant-based breast reconstruction is currently performed with placement of the implant in a subpectoral pocket beneath the pectoralis major muscle, by means of the dual-plane approach. Although the safety and breast aesthetics of this approach are well recognized, it is not without concerns. Animation deformities and accompanying patient discomfort, which are direct consequences of muscle elevation, can be severe in some patients. Moving the implant prepectorally may eliminate these concerns. For a successful prepectoral approach, the authors advocate use of their bioengineered breast concept, which was detailed in a previous publication. In this report, the authors discuss the rationale for prepectoral implant reconstruction, its indications/contraindications, and preliminary results from over 350 reconstructions.

Clinical question/level of evidence: Therapeutic, IV.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. American Society of Plastic Surgeons. 2015 plastic surgery statistics report. Available at: http://www.plasticsurgery.org/Documents/news-resources/statistics/2015-s.... Accessed June 21, 2016.
    1. Gruber RP, Kahn RA, Lash H, Maser MR, Apfelberg DB, Laub DR. Breast reconstruction following mastectomy: A comparison of submuscular and subcutaneous techniques. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1981;67:312317.
    1. Spear SL, Schwartz J, Dayan JH, Clemens MW. Outcome assessment of breast distortion following submuscular breast augmentation. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2009;33:4448.
    1. Maxwell GP, Gabriel A. Bioengineered breast: Concept, technique, and preliminary results. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016;137:415421.
    1. Glasberg SB, Light D. AlloDerm and Strattice in breast reconstruction: A comparison and techniques for optimizing outcomes. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012;129:12231233.