Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Jan 26;17(1):37.
doi: 10.1186/s12887-017-0796-x.

Reliability and validity of pediatric triage tools evaluated in Low resource settings: a systematic review

Bhakti Hansoti  1 , Alexander Jenson  2 , Devin Keefe  2 , Sarah Stewart De Ramirez  2 , Trisha Anest  2 , Michelle Twomey  3 , Katie Lobner  4 , Gabor Kelen  2 , Lee Wallis  3
Affiliations

Reliability and validity of pediatric triage tools evaluated in Low resource settings: a systematic review

Bhakti Hansoti et al. BMC Pediatr. .

Abstract

Background: Despite the high burden of pediatric mortality from preventable conditions in low and middle income countries and the existence of multiple tools to prioritize critically ill children in low-resource settings, no analysis exists of the reliability and validity of these tools in identifying critically ill children in these scenarios.

Methods: The authors performed a systematic search of the peer-reviewed literature published, for studies pertaining to for triage and IMCI in low and middle-income countries in English language, from January 01, 2000 to October 22, 2013. An updated literature search was performed on on July 1, 2015. The databases searched included the Cochrane Library, EMBASE, Medline, PubMed and Web of Science. Only studies that presented data on the reliability and validity evaluations of triage tool were included in this review. Two independent reviewers utilized a data abstraction tool to collect data on demographics, triage tool components and the reliability and validity data and summary findings for each triage tool assessed.

Results: Of the 4,717 studies searched, seven studies evaluating triage tools and 10 studies evaluating IMCI were included. There were wide varieties in method for assessing reliability and validity, with different settings, outcome metrics and statistical methods.

Conclusions: Studies evaluating triage tools for pediatric patients in low and middle income countries are scarce. Furthermore the methodology utilized in the conduct of these studies varies greatly and does not allow for the comparison of tools across study sites.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
PRISMA flow diagram of search methodology
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. You D, Hug L, Chen Y. Levels and trends in child mortality. UNICEF. New York: UNICEF; 2014.
    1. Barasa EW, Ayieko P, Cleary S, English M. A multifaceted intervention to improve the quality of care of children in district hospitals in Kenya: a cost-effectiveness analysis. PLoS Med. 2012;9(6):e1001238. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001238. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Jones G, Steketee RW, Black RE, Bhutta ZA, Morris SS. Bellagio child survival study G. How many child deaths can we prevent this year? Lancet. 2003;362(9377):65–71. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)13811-1. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Riviello ED, Letchford S, Achieng L, Newton MW. Critical care in resource-poor settings: lessons learned and future directions. Crit Care Med. 2011;39(4):860-7. - PubMed
    1. Farrohknia N, Castren M, Ehrenberg A, et al. Emergency department triage scales and their components: a systematic review of the scientific evidence. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2011;19:42. doi: 10.1186/1757-7241-19-42. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources