Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2016 Sep-Dec;8(3):173.
doi: 10.4103/0975-1475.195102.

Prosthodontics an "arsenal" in forensic dentistry

Affiliations
Review

Prosthodontics an "arsenal" in forensic dentistry

Lakshmana Rao Bathala et al. J Forensic Dent Sci. 2016 Sep-Dec.

Abstract

After major disasters such as earthquakes, fires, floods, tsunami, bomb blasts or terrorist attacks, accurate, and early identification of the dead and injured becomes an utmost importance. Restorations, cariesteeth, missingteeth and/or prostheses are most useful aids for the dental identification. At times, only identifiable remains are a victim's partial or complete dentures. The central principle of dental identification is that postmortem dental remains can be compared with antemortem dental records which include, studycasts, radiographs, etc., to confirm the identity of the victims. Marking/labeling dentures have been considered an important aid in forensic dentistry. Other than finger printing, when compared with all the methods, the marking/labeling of dentures is an accurate and rapid method to identify the unknown victims. There are no standardized methods to follow, but dental practitioners needs to maintain some dental records of their patients. This may include documentation of the "marking of dentures." The preparedness is the key to success in mass disaster identification. The aim of this review article is to discuss the methods of denture identification, advantages of denture labeling for the rapid identification during major disasters/accidents and the importance of maintaining the patient records.

Keywords: Antemortem records; dental profiling; identification of dentures; inclusion methods; marking/labeling; palatal rugoscopy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

There are no conflicts of interest.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Keiser-Nielsen S. Forensic odontology. Int Dent J. 1968;18:668–83. - PubMed
    1. Thomas T, Muruppel AM, Dinesh N, Gladstone S, George N. Denture in forensic identification – A review of methods & benefits. J Adv Med Dent Sci. 2014;2:85–94.
    1. Berketa JW, Hirsch RS, Higgins D, James H. Radiographic recognition of dental implants as an aid to identifying the deceased. J Forensic Sci. 2010;55:66–70. - PubMed
    1. Ohtani M, Nishida N, Chiba T, Fukuda M, Miyamoto Y, Yoshioka N. Indication and limitations of using palatal rugae for personal identification in edentulous cases. Forensic Sci Int. 2008;176:178–82. - PubMed
    1. Inoue M, Hanaoka Y, Minaguchi K. Personal identification by DNA analysis of samples from dental prostheses made of acrylic resin. Bull Tokyo Dent Coll. 2000;41:175–85.

LinkOut - more resources