Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017;8(1):39-42.
doi: 10.5847/wjem.j.1920-8642.2017.01.007.

A comparison of perspectives on costs in emergency care among emergency department patients and residents

Stefanie K Gilbert  1 , Leana S Wen  1 , Jesse M Pines  1
Affiliations

A comparison of perspectives on costs in emergency care among emergency department patients and residents

Stefanie K Gilbert et al. World J Emerg Med. 2017.

Abstract

Background: Costs of care are increasingly important in healthcare policy and, more recently, in clinical care in the emergency department (ED). We compare ED resident and patient perspectives surrounding costs in emergency care.

Methods: We conducted a mixed methods study using surveys and qualitative interviews at a single, academic ED in the United States. The two study populations were a convenience sample of adult ED patients (>17 years of age) and ED residents training at the same institution. Participants answered open- and closed-ended questions on costs, medical decision making, cost-related compliance, and communication about costs. Closed-ended data were tabulated and described using standard statistics while open-ended responses were analyzed using grounded theory.

Results: Thirty ED patients and 24 ED residents participated in the study. Both patients and residents generally did not have knowledge of medical costs. Patients were comfortable discussing costs while residents were less comfortable. Residents agreed that doctors should consider costs when making medical decisions whereas patients somewhat disagreed. Additionally, residents generally took costs into consideration during clinical decision-making, yet nearly all residents agreed that they had too little education on costs.

Conclusion: There were several notable differences in ED patient and resident perspectives on costs in this U.S. sample. While patients somewhat disagree that cost should factor into decision making, generally they are comfortable discussing costs yet report having insufficient knowledge of what care costs. Conversely, ED residents view costs as important and agree that cost should factor into decision making but lack education on what emergency care costs.

Keywords: Clinical decision-making; Communication; Cost; Emergency medicine; Residency education.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare there is no competing interest related to the study, authors, other individuals or organizations.

References

    1. Smith JC, Medalia C. U.S. Census Bureau, Current Population Reports, P60–253, Health insurance coverage in the United States, 2014. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office; 2015. Sep,
    1. Gallaraga JE, Pines JM. Costs of ED episodes of care in the United States. Am J Emerg Med. 2016;34(3):357–65. - PubMed
    1. Pines JM, Newman D, Pilgrim R, Schuur JD. Strategies for integrating cost-consciousness into acute care should focus on rewarding high-value care. Health Aff (Millwood) 2013;32(12):2157–65. - PubMed
    1. Pines JM, McStay F, George M, Wiler JL, McClellan M. Aligning payment reform and delivery innovation in emergency care. Am J Manag Care. 2016;22(8):515–8. - PubMed
    1. Maughan BC, Baren JM, Shea JA, Merchant RM. Choosing wisely in emergency medicine:a national survey of emergency medicine academic chairs and division chiefs. Acad Emerg Med. 2015;22(12):1506–10. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources