Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Jan 16;6(1):u211253.w4529.
doi: 10.1136/bmjquality.u211253.w4529. eCollection 2017.

The e-CRABEL score: an updated method for auditing medical records

Affiliations

The e-CRABEL score: an updated method for auditing medical records

Tharsika Myuran et al. BMJ Qual Improv Rep. .

Abstract

In 2001 the CRABEL score was devised in order to obtain a numerical score of the standard of medical note keeping. With the advent of electronic discharge letters, many components of the CRABEL score are now redundant as computers automatically include some documentation. The CRABEL score was modified to form the e-CRABEL score. "Patient details on discharge letter" and "Admission and discharge dates on discharge letter" were replaced with "Summary of investigations on discharge letter" and "Documentation of VTE prophylaxis on the drug chart". The new e-CRABEL score has been used as a monthly audit tool in a busy surgical unit to monitor long-term standards of medical note keeping, with interventions of presenting in the departmental audit meeting, and giving a teaching session to a group of junior doctors at two points. Following discussion with stakeholders: junior doctors, consultants, and the audit department; it was decided that the e-CRABEL tool was sufficiently compact to be completed on a monthly basis. Critique and interventions included using photographic examples, case note selection and clarification of the e-CRABEL criteria in a teaching session. Tools used for audit need to be updated in order to accurately represent what they measure, hence the modification of the CRABEL score to make the new e-CRABEL score. Preliminary acquisition and presentation of data using the e-CRABEL score has shown promise in improving the quality of medical record keeping. The tool is sufficiently compact as to conduct on a monthly basis, maintaining standards to a high level and also provides data on VTE documentation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
e-CRABEL Proforma.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Average score during monthly implementation of e-CRABEL.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Breakdown by firm pre and post monthly eCRABEL implementation.

References

    1. Rai GC, McInnes E, Phongsathorn V et al. . Medical audit of case notes on one to one basis. J R Coll Physicians 1991;25:358–9 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Crawford JR, Beresford TP, Lafferty KL. The CRABEL score--a method for auditing medical records. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2001. Jan;83:65–8. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Callen JL, Alderton M, McIntosh J. Evaluation of electronic discharge summaries: A comparison of documentation in electronic and handwritten discharge summaries. Int J Med Inform 2008;77:613–20. - PubMed
    1. NICE, Venous thromboembolism - reducing the risk. NICE;2010.
    1. Ho MY, Anderson AR, Nijjar A et al. . Use of the CRABEL Score for improving case-note quality. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2005;87:454–457. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources