Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2017 Feb;139(2):427-438.
doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000002941.

Autogenous Bone Reconstruction of Large Secondary Skull Defects

Jeffrey A Fearon  1   2 , Devan Griner  1   2 , Kanlaya Ditthakasem  1   2 , Morley Herbert  1   2
Affiliations
Review

Autogenous Bone Reconstruction of Large Secondary Skull Defects

Jeffrey A Fearon et al. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017 Feb.

Abstract

Background: The authors sought to ascertain the upper limits of secondary skull defect size amenable to autogenous reconstructions and to examine outcomes of a surgical series. Published data for autogenous and alloplastic skull reconstructions were also examined to explore associations that might guide treatment.

Methods: A retrospective review of autogenously reconstructed secondary skull defects was undertaken. A structured literature review was also performed to assess potential differences in reported outcomes between autogenous bone and synthetic alloplastic skull reconstructions. Weighted risks were calculated for statistical testing.

Results: Ninety-six patients underwent autogenous skull reconstruction for an average defect size of 93 cm (range, 4 to 506 cm) at a mean age of 12.9 years. The mean operative time was 3.4 hours, 2 percent required allogeneic blood transfusions, and the average length of stay was less than 3 days. The mean length of follow-up was 28 months. There were no postoperative infections requiring surgery, but one patient underwent secondary grafting for partial bone resorption. An analysis of 34 studies revealed that complications, infections, and reoperations were more commonly reported with alloplastic than with autogenous reconstructions (relative risk, 1.57, 4.8, and 1.48, respectively).

Conclusions: Autogenous reconstructions are feasible, with minimal associated morbidity, for patients with skull defect sizes as large as 500 cm. A structured literature review suggests that autogenous bone reconstructions are associated with lower reported infection, complication, and reoperation rates compared with synthetic alloplasts. Based on these findings, surgeons might consider using autogenous reconstructions even for larger skull defects.

Clinical question/level of evidence: Therapeutic, IV.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

References

    1. Akan M, Karaca M, Eker G, Karanfil H, Aköz T. Is polymethylmethacrylate reliable and practical in full-thickness cranial defect reconstructions? J Craniofac Surg. 2011;22:12361239.
    1. Al-Tamimi YZ, Sinha P, Trivedi M, et al. Comparison of acrylic and titanium cranioplasty. Br J Neurosurg. 2012;26:510513.
    1. Andrzejak S, Fortuniak J, Wróbel-Wiśniewska G, Zawirski M. Clinical evaluation of the polypropylene-polyester knit used as a cranioplasty material. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2005;147:973976; discussion 976.
    1. Artico M, Ferrante L, Pastore FS, et al. Bone autografting of the calvaria and craniofacial skeleton: Historical background, surgical results in a series of 15 patients, and review of the literature. Surg Neurol. 2003;60:7179.
    1. Azmi A, Latiff AZ, Johari A. Methyl methacrylate cranioplasty. Med J Malaysia 2004;59:418421.