Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Jan 26;10(1):66.
doi: 10.1186/s13104-017-2381-7.

A hemodialysis cohort study of protocol-based anticoagulation management

S Lamontagne  1   2 , Tinzar Basein  3 , Binyue Chang  3 , Lakshmi Mallela  3
Affiliations

A hemodialysis cohort study of protocol-based anticoagulation management

S Lamontagne et al. BMC Res Notes. .

Abstract

Background: Chronic hemodialysis patients frequently require anticoagulation treatment with warfarin for a variety of co-morbidities. The optimal method for monitoring and dose adjustment of warfarin-based anticoagulation in this population, however, remains unclear. To examine this more closely, we reviewed all hemodialysis patients at a single institution on chronic warfarin therapy for a 10-month period prior to and after the institution of a standardized protocol for warfarin dose adjustment and monitoring. Anticoagulation efficacy was assessed by time within the therapeutic INR range (TTR), and resource utilization was assessed by the number of weekly INR measurements required for monitoring.

Results: We retrospectively analyzed 4481 patient-days of warfarin therapy data (from 25 hemodialysis patients) in the pre-protocol timeframe, and 3308 patient-days of warfarin therapy data (from 21 hemodialysis patients) in the on-protocol timeframe. Time within the therapeutic INR range (TTR) did not improve with institution of the dosing protocol-51.18% using non protocol-based management, and 51.57% using protocol-based management (p 0.73). However, overall resource utilization was reduced with institution of protocolized warfarin monitoring-from 1.71 INR measurements per patient-week pre-protocol, to 1.20 INR measurements per patient-week (p < 0.0001) post-protocol.

Conclusions: In this single-center study, institution of a standardized dosing protocol in a hemodialysis population on chronic warfarin therapy did not improve the rate of on-target anticoagulation, but did result in significantly lower resource utilization. We support protocol-based warfarin management in the hemodialysis population, but future work should examine the rate of on-target anticoagulation typically achieved in this group.

Keywords: Anticoagulation; Hemodialysis; Warfarin.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Warfarin monitoring and dose adjustment protocol for Target INR 2.0–3.0 Follow up Algorithm
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Warfarin monitoring and dose adjustment protocol for Target INR 2.5–3.5 Follow up Algorithm
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Winkelmayer W, Patrick A, Liu J, Brookhart MA, Setoguchi S. The increasing prevalence of atrial fibrillation among hemodialysis patients. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2011;22:349–357. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2010050459. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Holbrook A, Schulman S, Witt D, Vandvik P, Fish J, Kovacs M, et al. Evidence-based management of anticoagulant therapy. Antithrombotic therapy and prevention of thrombosis, 9th edition. ACCP guidelines. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Thomson B, MacRae J, Barnieh L, Zhang J, MacKay E, Manning M, et al. Evaluation of an electronic warfarin nomogram for anticoagulation of hemodialysis patients. BMC Nephrol. 2011;12(1):46. doi: 10.1186/1471-2369-12-46. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rosendaal F, Cannegieter S, van der Meer F, Briet E. A Method to determine the optimal intensity of oral anticoagulant therapy. Thromb Haemost. 1993;69(3):236–239. - PubMed
    1. Reynolds MW, Fahrbach K, Hauch O, Wygant G, Estok R, Cella C, et al. Warfarin anticoagulation and outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation: a systemic review and meta-analysis. Chest. 2004;126:1938–1945. doi: 10.1378/chest.126.6.1938. - DOI - PubMed