Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Jan 26;36(1):11.
doi: 10.1186/s40101-017-0128-8.

Increase in brain activation due to sub-tasks during driving: fMRI study using new MR-compatible driving simulator

Affiliations

Increase in brain activation due to sub-tasks during driving: fMRI study using new MR-compatible driving simulator

Mi-Hyun Choi et al. J Physiol Anthropol. .

Abstract

Background: Several studies have used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to show that neural activity is associated with driving. fMRI studies have also elucidated the brain responses associated with driving while performing sub-tasks. It is important to note that these studies used computer mouses, trackballs, or joysticks to simulate driving and, thus, were not comparable to real driving situations. In order to overcome these limitations, we used a driving wheel and pedal equipped with an MR-compatible driving simulator (80 km/h). The subjects drove while performing sub-tasks, and we attempted to observe differences in neuronal activation.

Methods: The experiments consisted of three blocks and each block consisted of both a control phase (1 min) and a driving phase (2 min). During the control phase, the drivers were instructed to look at the stop screen and to not perform driving tasks. During the driving phase, the drivers either drove (driving only condition) or drove while performing an additional sub-task (driving with sub-task condition) at 80 km/h.

Results: Compared to when the drivers were focused only on driving, when the drivers drove while performing a sub-task, the number of activation voxels greatly decreased in the parietal area, which is responsible for spatial perception. Task-performing areas, such as the inferior frontal gyrus and the superior temporal gyrus, showed increased activation. Performing a sub-task simultaneously while driving had affected the driver's driving. The cingulate gyrus and the sub-lobar region (lentiform nucleus, caudate, insula, and thalamus), which are responsible for error monitoring and control of unnecessary movements (e.g., wheel and pedal movements), showed increased activation during driving with sub-task condition compared to driving only condition.

Conclusions: Unlike simple driving simulators (joysticks, computer mouses, or trackballs) used in previous research, the addition of a driving wheel and pedals (accelerator and brake) to the driving simulator used in this study closely represents real driving. Thus, the number of processed movements was increased, which led to an increased number of unnecessary movements that needed to be controlled. This in turn increased activation in the corresponding brain regions.

Keywords: Driving; MR-compatible driving simulator; Sub-lobar; Sub-task (additional task); fMRI.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
a MR-compatible driving simulator consisting of driving wheel, accelerator, and brake. b Driving environment (Lightrock Entertainment Inc., S/W). c Preparation before the experiment
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
The functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) experimental procedure
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Brain activation areas for a driving only condition—control, b driving with sub-task condition—control, and c sub-task only condition—control (corrected p < 0.05 s)
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Brain activation areas for a driving only condition—driving with sub-task condition and b driving with sub-task condition—driving only condition (corrected p < 0.05)

References

    1. Groeger JA. Understanding driving: applying cognitive psychology to a complex everyday task. New York: Psychology Press; 2000.
    1. Michon JA. Explanatory pitfalls and rule-based driver models. Accid Anal Prev. 1989;21:341–53. doi: 10.1016/0001-4575(89)90025-0. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Calhoun VD, Pekar JJ, McGinty VB, Adali T, Watson TD, Pearlson GD. Different activation dynamics in multiple neural systems during simulated driving. Hum Brain Mapp. 2002;16:158–67. doi: 10.1002/hbm.10032. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Campagne A, Pebayle T, Muzet A. Correlation between driving errors and vigilance level: influence of the driver’s age. Physiol Behav. 2004;80:515–24. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2003.10.004. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Graydon FX, Young R, Benton MD, Genik RJ, II, Posse S, Hsieh L, Green C. Visual event detection during simulated driving: identifying the neural correlates with functional neuroimaging. Transport Res Part F: Traffic Psychol Behav. 2004;7:271–86. doi: 10.1016/j.trf.2004.09.006. - DOI