Evidence against observational spatial memory for cache locations of conspecifics in marsh tits Poecile palustris
- PMID: 28127116
- PMCID: PMC5225171
- DOI: 10.1007/s00265-016-2264-2
Evidence against observational spatial memory for cache locations of conspecifics in marsh tits Poecile palustris
Abstract
Abstract: Many species in the family Paridae, such as marsh tits Poecile palustris, are large-scale scatter hoarders of food that make cryptic caches and disperse these in large year-round territories. The perhaps most well-known species in the family, the great tit Parus major, does not store food itself but is skilled in stealing caches from the other species. We have previously demonstrated that great tits are able to memorise positions of caches they have observed marsh tits make and later return and steal the food. As great tits are explorative in nature and unusually good learners, it is possible that such "memorisation of caches from a distance" is a unique ability of theirs. The other possibility is that this ability is general in the parid family. Here, we tested marsh tits in the same experimental set-up as where we previously have tested great tits. We allowed caged marsh tits to observe a caching conspecific in a specially designed indoor arena. After a retention interval of 1 or 24 h, we allowed the observer to enter the arena and search for the caches. The marsh tits showed no evidence of such observational memorization ability, and we believe that such ability is more useful for a non-hoarding species. Why should a marsh tit that memorises hundreds of their own caches in the field bother with the difficult task of memorising other individuals' caches? We argue that the close-up memorisation procedure that marsh tits use at their own caches may be a different type of observational learning than memorisation of caches made by others. For example, the latter must be done from a distance and hence may require the ability to adopt an allocentric perspective, i.e. the ability to visualise the cache from the hoarder's perspective.
Significance statement: Members of the Paridae family are known to possess foraging techniques that are cognitively advanced. Previously, we have demonstrated that a non-hoarding parid species, the great tit P. major, is able to memorise positions of caches that they have observed marsh tits P. palustris make. However, it is unknown whether this cognitively advanced foraging strategy is unique to great tits or if it occurs also in other parids. Here, we demonstrated that "pilfering by observational memorization strategy" is not a general strategy in parids. We believe that such ability is important for a non-hoarding species such as the great tit and, most likely, birds owning many caches do not need this foraging strategy.
Keywords: Cache pilfering; Food hoarding; Observational learning; Paridae; Scatter hoarding; Spatial memory.
Conflict of interest statement
Compliance with ethical standardsEthical approvalOur study complies with the Swedish animal welfare legislations and regulations. All animals were kept under the permit M-213-11 from Malmö-Lund regional ethical permit board. This article does not contain any studies with human participants performed by any of the authors.FundingThis research was supported by the Carl Trygger Foundation for Scientific Research (CTS 15:74) and the Royal Physiographic Society of Lund (KFS 151111).Conflict of interestThe authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Figures
Similar articles
-
No evidence for memory interference across sessions in food hoarding marsh tits Poecile palustris under laboratory conditions.Anim Cogn. 2015 May;18(3):649-56. doi: 10.1007/s10071-015-0833-9. Epub 2015 Jan 9. Anim Cogn. 2015. PMID: 25573290
-
Development of memory and the hippocampus: comparison of food-storing and nonstoring birds on a one-trial associative memory task.J Neurosci. 1995 Apr;15(4):2796-807. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.15-04-02796.1995. J Neurosci. 1995. PMID: 7722629 Free PMC article.
-
A complete multilocus species phylogeny of the tits and chickadees (Aves: Paridae).Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2013 Dec;69(3):852-60. doi: 10.1016/j.ympev.2013.06.019. Epub 2013 Jul 2. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2013. PMID: 23831453
-
The history of scatter hoarding studies.Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2010 Mar 27;365(1542):869-81. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2009.0217. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2010. PMID: 20156813 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Memory and the hippocampus in food-storing birds: a comparative approach.Neuropharmacology. 1998 Apr-May;37(4-5):441-52. doi: 10.1016/s0028-3908(98)00037-9. Neuropharmacology. 1998. PMID: 9704985 Review.
Cited by
-
Environmental harshness does not affect the propensity for social learning in great tits, Parus major.Anim Cogn. 2024 Mar 12;27(1):25. doi: 10.1007/s10071-024-01862-w. Anim Cogn. 2024. PMID: 38467946 Free PMC article.
-
Food hoarders and non-hoarders in Paridae - a cognition perspective.Anim Cogn. 2025 Aug 13;28(1):78. doi: 10.1007/s10071-025-01998-3. Anim Cogn. 2025. PMID: 40802061 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Old and New Approaches to Animal Cognition: There Is Not "One Cognition".J Intell. 2020 Jul 2;8(3):28. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence8030028. J Intell. 2020. PMID: 32630788 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Baker MC, Stone E, Baker AEM, Shelden RJ, Skillicorn P, Mantych MD. Evidence against observational-learning in storage and recovery of seeds by black-capped chickadees. Auk. 1988;105:492–497.
-
- Bednekoff PA, Balda RP. Observational spatial memory in Clark’s nutcrackers and Mexican jays. Anim Behav. 1996;52:833–839. doi: 10.1006/anbe.1996.0228. - DOI
-
- Brodin A. Cache dispersion affects retrieval time in hoarding willow tits. Ornis Scand. 1992;23:7–12. doi: 10.2307/3676420. - DOI
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Research Materials