Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017;71(2):34.
doi: 10.1007/s00265-016-2264-2. Epub 2017 Jan 10.

Evidence against observational spatial memory for cache locations of conspecifics in marsh tits Poecile palustris

Affiliations

Evidence against observational spatial memory for cache locations of conspecifics in marsh tits Poecile palustris

A Utku Urhan et al. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 2017.

Abstract

Abstract: Many species in the family Paridae, such as marsh tits Poecile palustris, are large-scale scatter hoarders of food that make cryptic caches and disperse these in large year-round territories. The perhaps most well-known species in the family, the great tit Parus major, does not store food itself but is skilled in stealing caches from the other species. We have previously demonstrated that great tits are able to memorise positions of caches they have observed marsh tits make and later return and steal the food. As great tits are explorative in nature and unusually good learners, it is possible that such "memorisation of caches from a distance" is a unique ability of theirs. The other possibility is that this ability is general in the parid family. Here, we tested marsh tits in the same experimental set-up as where we previously have tested great tits. We allowed caged marsh tits to observe a caching conspecific in a specially designed indoor arena. After a retention interval of 1 or 24 h, we allowed the observer to enter the arena and search for the caches. The marsh tits showed no evidence of such observational memorization ability, and we believe that such ability is more useful for a non-hoarding species. Why should a marsh tit that memorises hundreds of their own caches in the field bother with the difficult task of memorising other individuals' caches? We argue that the close-up memorisation procedure that marsh tits use at their own caches may be a different type of observational learning than memorisation of caches made by others. For example, the latter must be done from a distance and hence may require the ability to adopt an allocentric perspective, i.e. the ability to visualise the cache from the hoarder's perspective.

Significance statement: Members of the Paridae family are known to possess foraging techniques that are cognitively advanced. Previously, we have demonstrated that a non-hoarding parid species, the great tit P. major, is able to memorise positions of caches that they have observed marsh tits P. palustris make. However, it is unknown whether this cognitively advanced foraging strategy is unique to great tits or if it occurs also in other parids. Here, we demonstrated that "pilfering by observational memorization strategy" is not a general strategy in parids. We believe that such ability is important for a non-hoarding species such as the great tit and, most likely, birds owning many caches do not need this foraging strategy.

Keywords: Cache pilfering; Food hoarding; Observational learning; Paridae; Scatter hoarding; Spatial memory.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Compliance with ethical standardsEthical approvalOur study complies with the Swedish animal welfare legislations and regulations. All animals were kept under the permit M-213-11 from Malmö-Lund regional ethical permit board. This article does not contain any studies with human participants performed by any of the authors.FundingThis research was supported by the Carl Trygger Foundation for Scientific Research (CTS 15:74) and the Royal Physiographic Society of Lund (KFS 151111).Conflict of interestThe authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
a Proportion of correct looks in the first 10 looks after 1-h, 24-h and control sessions. b Number of attempts before the first correct look in 1-h, 24-h and control sessions. The error bars are 95% confidence intervals

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Aplin LM, Farine DR, Morand-Ferron J, Cockburn A, Thornton A, Sheldon BC. Experimentally induced innovations lead to persistent culture via conformity in wild birds. Nature. 2015;518:538–541. doi: 10.1038/nature13998. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Baker MC, Stone E, Baker AEM, Shelden RJ, Skillicorn P, Mantych MD. Evidence against observational-learning in storage and recovery of seeds by black-capped chickadees. Auk. 1988;105:492–497.
    1. Bednekoff PA, Balda RP. Observational spatial memory in Clark’s nutcrackers and Mexican jays. Anim Behav. 1996;52:833–839. doi: 10.1006/anbe.1996.0228. - DOI
    1. Brodin A. Cache dispersion affects retrieval time in hoarding willow tits. Ornis Scand. 1992;23:7–12. doi: 10.2307/3676420. - DOI
    1. Brodin A. Hippocampal volume does not correlate with food-hoarding rates in the black-capped chickadee (Poecile atricapillus) and willow tit (Parus montanus) Auk. 2005;122:819–828. doi: 10.1642/0004-8038(2005)122[0819:HVDNCW]2.0.CO;2. - DOI

LinkOut - more resources