Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2017 Mar;8(1):51-58.
doi: 10.1007/s13193-016-0588-z. Epub 2016 Dec 17.

Current Concepts in Management of Stage I NSGCT

Affiliations
Review

Current Concepts in Management of Stage I NSGCT

Puneet Ahluwalia et al. Indian J Surg Oncol. 2017 Mar.

Abstract

While about 50% of non- seminomatous germ cell tumors of the testes present as clinical stage I (CSI), further management of these patients continues to be mired in controversy. Active surveillance is a frontline option for low- risk CS I patients and according to some, even the high- risk ones with high embryonal carcinoma (ECA) component and vascular invasion (VI). However, it carries the disadvantage of long- term surveillance, the need for prolonged chemotherapy in case of recurrence and the possibility of secondary malignancies due to radiation exposure from frequent CT scans. One or two cycles of BEP chemotherapy is a popular alternative to active surveillance which carries a very low relapse rate, but valid concerns about overtreatment of a majority of patients, with the attendant chemotherapy- related toxicity exist. Retroperitoneal lymph node dissection has been used as a means of avoiding chemotherapy, especially in high- risk patients, but carries the disadvantage of a high surgical morbidity and complications. As with any major surgical procedure, the best results are dependent on the experience and skill of the individual surgeon.

Keywords: Active surveillance; BEP chemotherapy; Non seminomatous germ cell tumor; Retroperitoneal lymph node dissection; Stage I NSGCT; Testicular cancer.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Read G, Stenning SP, Cullen MH, Parkinson MC, Horwich A, Kaye SB, et al. Medical Research Council prospective study of surveillance for stage I testicular teratoma. Medical Research Council testicular tumors working party. J Clin Oncol. 1992;10(11):1762–1768. - PubMed
    1. Daugaard G, Petersen PM, Rorth M. Surveillance in stage I testicular cancer. APMIS. 2003;111(1):76–83; discussion −5. - PubMed
    1. Colls BM, Harvey VJ, Skelton L, Frampton CM, Thompson PI, Bennett M, et al. Late results of surveillance of clinical stage I nonseminoma germ cell testicular tumours: 17 years’ experience in a national study in New Zealand. BJU Int. 1999;83(1):76–82. doi: 10.1046/j.1464-410x.1999.00869.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. de Wit R, Fizazi K. Controversies in the management of clinical stage I testis cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24(35):5482–5492. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2006.07.9434. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Krug B, Heidenreich A, Dietlein M, Lackner K. The lymph node staging of malignant testicular germ-cell tumors. Rofo. 1999;171(2):87–94. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources