Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Jan 14;23(2):216-223.
doi: 10.3748/wjg.v23.i2.216.

SPECT-computed tomography in rats with TNBS-induced colitis: A first step toward functional imaging

Affiliations

SPECT-computed tomography in rats with TNBS-induced colitis: A first step toward functional imaging

Rachel Marion-Letellier et al. World J Gastroenterol. .

Abstract

Aim: To assess the feasibility of SPECT-computed tomography (CT) in rats with trinitrobenzene sulfonic acid (TNBS)-induced acute colitis and confront it with model inflammatory characteristics.

Methods: Colitis was induced in Sprague-Dawley rats by intrarectal injection of TNBS (n = 10) while controls received vehicle (n = 10). SPECT-CT with intravenous injection of 10 MBq of 67Ga-Citrate was performed at day 2. SPECT-CT criteria were colon wall thickness and maximal wall signal intensity. Laboratory parameters were assessed: colon weight:length ratio, colon cyclooxygenase-2 expression by western blot and histological inflammatory score.

Results: Colon weight/length ratio, colon COX-2 expression and histological inflammatory score were significantly higher in the TNBS group than in the control group (P = 0.0296, P < 0.0001, P = 0.0007 respectively). Pixel max tend to be higher in the TNBS group than in the control group but did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.0662). Maximal thickness is significantly increased in the TNBS group compared to the control group (P = 0.0016) while colon diameter is not (P = 0.1904). Maximal thickness and colon diameter were correlated to colon COX-2 expression (P = 0.0093, P = 0.009 respectively) while pixel max was not (P = 0.22). Maximal thickness was significantly increased when inflammation was histologically observed (P = 0.0043) while pixel max and colon diameter did not (P = 0.2452, P = 0.3541, respectively).

Conclusion: SPECT-CT is feasible and easily distinguished control from colitic rats.

Keywords: Colitis; Colitis imaging; Crohn’s disease; Cyclooxygenase-2; SPECT-computed tomography.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict-of-interest statement: We declare that we have no financial and personal relationships with other people or organizations that could inappropriately influence our work.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Sagittal and coronal images of SPECT-computed tomography and the corresponding value of maximal signal colon wall intensity in a control (A) or 2,4,6-trinitrobenzene sulfonic acid (B) rat.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Validation of colitis. Colon weight: length ratio (A) colon cyclo-oxygenase-2 expression (B), inflammatory score (C) in rats with TNBS-induced colitis at day 2. Colitis was induced in rats by intrarectal injection of TNBS at day 0. aP < 0.05, bP < 0.01 vs control rats respectively.
Figure 3
Figure 3
SPECT-computed tomography parameters. Maximal thickness (A), pixel max (B) and colon diameter (C) in rats with TNBS-induced colitis at day 2. Colitis was induced in rats by intrarectal injection of TNBS at day 0.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Association between SPECT-computed tomography parameters with inflammatory markers in rats with 2,4,6-trinitrobenzene sulfonic acid-induced colitis. Colitis was induced in rats by intrarectal injection of TNBS at day 0. SPECT- computed tomography was performed at day 2. A: Simple linear regression between maximal thickness and colon cycloxygenase-2 expression; B: Simple linear regression between pixel max and colon weight:length ratio; C: Simple linear regression between colon diameter and colon cycloxygenase-2 expression; D: Maximal thickness according to histological inflammation score.

References

    1. Cosnes J. Measuring structural damage in Crohn’s disease. Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y) 2013;9:103–104. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Baert F, Moortgat L, Van Assche G, Caenepeel P, Vergauwe P, De Vos M, Stokkers P, Hommes D, Rutgeerts P, Vermeire S, et al. Mucosal healing predicts sustained clinical remission in patients with early-stage Crohn’s disease. Gastroenterology. 2010;138:463–468; quiz e410-461. - PubMed
    1. D’Haens GR, Fedorak R, Lémann M, Feagan BG, Kamm MA, Cosnes J, Rutgeerts PJ, Marteau P, Travis S, Schölmerich J, et al. Endpoints for clinical trials evaluating disease modification and structural damage in adults with Crohn’s disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2009;15:1599–1604. - PubMed
    1. Pariente B, Cosnes J, Danese S, Sandborn WJ, Lewin M, Fletcher JG, Chowers Y, D’Haens G, Feagan BG, Hibi T, et al. Development of the Crohn’s disease digestive damage score, the Lémann score. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2011;17:1415–1422. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ko CW, Dominitz JA. Complications of colonoscopy: magnitude and management. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2010;20:659–671. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms