Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2017 Jan 12:7:2173.
doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.02173. eCollection 2016.

Azole Antifungal Resistance in Candida albicans and Emerging Non- albicans Candida Species

Affiliations
Review

Azole Antifungal Resistance in Candida albicans and Emerging Non- albicans Candida Species

Sarah G Whaley et al. Front Microbiol. .

Abstract

Within the limited antifungal armamentarium, the azole antifungals are the most frequent class used to treat Candida infections. Azole antifungals such as fluconazole are often preferred treatment for many Candida infections as they are inexpensive, exhibit limited toxicity, and are available for oral administration. There is, however, extensive documentation of intrinsic and developed resistance to azole antifungals among several Candida species. As the frequency of azole resistant Candida isolates in the clinical setting increases, it is essential to elucidate the mechanisms of such resistance in order to both preserve and improve upon the azole class of antifungals for the treatment of Candida infections. This review examines azole resistance in infections caused by C. albicans as well as the emerging non-albicans Candida species C. parapsilosis, C. tropicalis, C. krusei, and C. glabrata and in particular, describes the current understanding of molecular basis of azole resistance in these fungal species.

Keywords: Candida albicans; Candida glabrata; Candida krusei; Candida parapsilosis; Candida tropicalis; antifungal; azole; resistance.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Comparison of documented fluconazole resistance mechanisms in Candida species. (A) Erg3 inactivation results in utilization of alternative sterols in the yeast membrane. (B) Uptake of exogenous sterols helps circumvent endogenous sterol production inhibition by fluconazole. Increased production of both (C) ATP-binding cassette efflux pumps and (D) major facilitator superfamily transporters reduces intracellular accumulation of azoles. (E) Inherently low affinity of fluconazole binding to species-specific Erg11 may decrease fluconazole's potential to inhibit the protein. (F) Increased expression of Erg11 protein can help overcome azole activity and (G) aneuploidy may promote genetic adaptation to azole exposure. (H) Mutations in ERG11 can also result in proteins with reduced affinity for fluconazole binding.

References

    1. Abi-Said D., Anaissie E., Uzun O., Raad I., Pinzcowski H., Vartivarian S. (1997). The epidemiology of hematogenous candidiasis caused by different Candida species. Clin. Infect. Dis. 24, 1122–1128. 10.1086/513663 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Alarco A. M., Raymond M. (1999). The bZip transcription factor Cap1p is involved in multidrug resistance and oxidative stress response in Candida albicans. J. Bacteriol. 181, 700–708. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Azie N., Neofytos D., Pfaller M., Meier-Kriesche H. U., Quan S. P., Horn D. (2012). The PATH (Prospective Antifungal Therapy) Alliance(R) registry and invasive fungal infections: update 2012. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 73, 293–300. 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2012.06.012 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Barchiesi F., Calabrese D., Sanglard D., Falconi Di Francesco L., Caselli F., Giannini D., et al. . (2000). Experimental induction of fluconazole resistance in Candida tropicalis ATCC 750. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 44, 1578–1584. 10.1128/AAC.44.6.1578-1584.2000 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bard M., Sturm A. M., Pierson C. A., Brown S., Rogers K. M., Nabinger S., et al. . (2005). Sterol uptake in Candida glabrata: rescue of sterol auxotrophic strains. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 52, 285–293. 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2005.03.001 - DOI - PubMed