Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Feb;52 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):437-458.
doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12643.

Does the Regulatory Environment Affect Nurse Practitioners' Patterns of Practice or Quality of Care in Health Centers?

Ellen T Kurtzman  1 , Burt S Barnow  2 , Jean E Johnson  1 , Samuel J Simmens  3 , Donna Lind Infeld  2 , Fitzhugh Mullan  4
Affiliations

Does the Regulatory Environment Affect Nurse Practitioners' Patterns of Practice or Quality of Care in Health Centers?

Ellen T Kurtzman et al. Health Serv Res. 2017 Feb.

Abstract

Objective: To examine the impact of state-granted nurse practitioner (NP) independence on patient-level quality, service utilization, and referrals.

Data sources/study setting: The National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey's community health center (HC) subsample (2006-2011). Primary analyses included approximately 6,500 patient visits to 350 NPs in 220 HCs.

Study design: Propensity score matching and multivariate regression analysis were used to estimate the impact of state-granted NP independence on each outcome, separately. Estimates were adjusted for sampling weights and NAMCS's complex design.

Data collection/extraction methods: Every "NP-patient visit unit" was isolated using practitioner and patient visit codes and, using geographic identifiers, assigned to its state-year and that state-year's level of NP independence based on scope of practice policies. Nine outcomes were specified using ICD-9 codes, standardized drug classification codes, and NAMCS survey items.

Principal findings: After matching, no statistically significant differences in quality were detected by states' independence status, although NP visits in states with prescriptive independence received more educational services (aIRR 1.66; 95 percent CI 1.09-2.53; p = .02) and medications (aIRR 1.26; 95 percent CI 1.04-1.53; p = .02), and NP visits in states with practice independence had a higher odds of receiving physician referrals (AOR 1.88; 95 percent CI 1.10-3.22; p = .02) than those in restricted states.

Conclusions: Findings do not support a quality-scope of practice relationship.

Keywords: Nurse practitioner; community health center; quality of care; scope of practice; state policy.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Addressing Healthcare Workforce Issues for the Future : Hearing before the United States Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions. 110th Cong., 2nd sess. (2008) (testimony of A.B. Steinwald).
    1. Akerlof, G. A. 1970. “The Market for ‘Lemons’: Quality Uncertainty and the Market Mechanisms.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 84 (3): 488–500.
    1. APRN Consensus Work Group & the National Council of State Boards of Nursing APRN Advisory Committee . (2008). “Consensus Model for APRN Regulation: Licensure, Accreditation, Certification & Education.” Available at https://ncsbn.org/Consensus_Model_for_APRN_Regulation_July_2008.pdf
    1. Auerbach, D. I. 2012. “Will the NP Workforce Grow in the Future? New Forecasts and Implications for Healthcare Delivery.” Medical Care 50 (7): 606–10. - PubMed
    1. Berry, F. , and Berry W.. 2007. “Innovation and Diffusion Models in Policy Research” In Theories of the Policy Process, 2nd edition, edited by Sabatier P. A., pp. 223–60. Cambridge, MA: Westview Press.

Publication types

MeSH terms