Factors facilitating a national quality registry to aid clinical quality improvement: findings of a national survey
- PMID: 28128099
- PMCID: PMC5128910
- DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011562
Factors facilitating a national quality registry to aid clinical quality improvement: findings of a national survey
Abstract
Objectives: While national quality registries (NQRs) are suggested to provide opportunities for systematic follow-up and learning opportunities, and thus clinical improvements, features in registries and contexts triggering such processes are not fully known. This study focuses on one of the world's largest stroke registries, the Swedish NQR Riksstroke, investigating what aspects of the registry and healthcare organisations facilitate or hinder the use of registry data in clinical quality improvement.
Methods: Following particular qualitative studies, we performed a quantitative survey in an exploratory sequential design. The survey, including 50 items on context, processes and the registry, was sent to managers, physicians and nurses engaged in Riksstroke in all 72 Swedish stroke units. Altogether, 242 individuals were presented with the survey; 163 responded, representing all but two units. Data were analysed descriptively and through multiple linear regression.
Results: A majority (88%) considered Riksstroke data to facilitate detection of stroke care improvement needs and acknowledged that their data motivated quality improvements (78%). The use of Riksstroke for quality improvement initiatives was associated (R2=0.76) with 'Colleagues' call for local results' (p=<0.001), 'Management Request of Registry data' (p=<0.001), and it was said to be 'Simple to explain the results to colleagues' (p=0.02). Using stepwise regression, 'Colleagues' call for local results' was identified as the most influential factor. Yet, while 73% reported that managers request registry data, only 39% reported that their colleagues call for the unit's Riksstroke results.
Conclusions: While an NQR like Riksstroke demonstrates improvement needs and motivates stakeholders to make progress, local stroke care staff and managers need to engage to keep the momentum going in terms of applying registry data when planning, performing and evaluating quality initiatives.
Keywords: HEALTH SERVICES ADMINISTRATION & MANAGEMENT.
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflicts of Interest: None declared.
References
-
- Health Resources and Services Administration. Managing data for performance improvement. US Department of Health and Human Services; http://www.hrsa.gov/quality/toolbox/methodology/performanceimprovement/ (accessed 5 Nov 2015).
-
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Use of a registry to improve acute stroke care—seven states, 2005–2009. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2011;60:206–10. - PubMed
-
- Jacobsson Ekman G, Lindahl B, Nordin A, eds. [National quality registries in health care]. Stockholm, Sweden: Karolinska Institutet University Press, 2014:14–24.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous