Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Apr;82(4):704-713.
doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000001381.

Parenteral and enteral nutrition in surgical critical care: Plasma metabolomics demonstrates divergent effects on nitrogen, fatty-acid, ribonucleotide, and oxidative metabolism

Affiliations

Parenteral and enteral nutrition in surgical critical care: Plasma metabolomics demonstrates divergent effects on nitrogen, fatty-acid, ribonucleotide, and oxidative metabolism

Brodie A Parent et al. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2017 Apr.

Abstract

Background: Artificial nutrition support is central to the care of critically ill patients and is primarily provided enterally (EN). There are circumstances when parenteral nutrition (PN) is considered necessary. We are uncertain how each of these approaches confer clinical benefits beyond simply providing calories. We sought to better understand how each of these techniques influence metabolism in critically ill patients using a broad-based metabolomics approach. Metabolic responses to EN and PN may differ in ways that could help us understand how to optimize use of these therapies.

Methods: We prospectively enrolled subjects over 7 months in 2015 at an urban, Level I trauma center. Subjects were included before starting either EN or PN during their inpatient admission. Plasma samples were obtained between 1 and 12 hours before initiation of artificial nutrition, and 3 and 7 days later. All samples were analyzed with liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry-based metabolomics. Differences in metabolite concentrations were assessed via principal component analyses and multiple linear regression.

Results: We enrolled 30 subjects. Among the critically ill subjects, 10 received EN and 10 received PN. In subjects receiving EN, amino acid and urea cycle metabolites (citrulline, p = 0.04; ornithine, p = 0.05) increased, as did ribonucleic acid metabolites (uridine, p = 0.04; cysteine, 0 = 0.05; oxypurinol, p = 0.04). Oxidative stress decreased over time (increased betaine, p = 0.05; decreased 4-pyridoxic acid, p = 0.04). In subjects receiving PN, amino acid concentrations increased over time (taurine, p = 0.04; phenylalanine, p = 0.05); omega 6 and omega 3 fatty acid concentrations decreased over time (p = 0.05 and 0.03, respectively).

Conclusion: EN was associated with amino acid repletion, urea cycle upregulation, restoration of antioxidants, and increasing ribonucleic acid synthesis. Parenteral nutrition was associated with increased amino acid concentrations, but did not influence protein metabolism or antioxidant repletion. This suggests that parenteral amino acids are used less effectively than those given enterally. The biomarkers reported in this study may be useful in guiding nutrition therapy for critically ill patients.

Level of evidence: Therapeutic study, level III; prognostic study, level II.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of interest and disclosures: There are no additional conflicts of interest declared by the authors.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Principal component analysis of plasma samples on day 0, day 3 and day 7 for a) subjects started on enteral nutrition and b) subjects started on parenteral nutrition.ϕ ϕ Each data point represents an individual plasma sample. Points which are close together represent samples with similar metabolic phenotypes; points which are far away have dissimilar metabolic phenotypes. The large symbols represent the mean values of the sample scores for a given group.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Plasma metabolome heat-maps for: I) subjects on enteral nutrition over time, demonstrating a) increasing amino acid and urea cycle metabolites, and b) increasing RNA synthetic products; II) subjects on parenteral nutrition over time, demonstrating c) decreasing urea cycle metabolites, and d) decreasing essential fatty acids.ϕ ϕ Generated using mass-spectrometry based metabolomics. Due to unmeasurably low levels of relevant metabolites, one sample was omitted from parts a) and b), and two samples were omitted from parts c) and d).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Plasma metabolome heat-maps for: I) subjects on enteral nutrition over time, demonstrating a) increasing amino acid and urea cycle metabolites, and b) increasing RNA synthetic products; II) subjects on parenteral nutrition over time, demonstrating c) decreasing urea cycle metabolites, and d) decreasing essential fatty acids.ϕ ϕ Generated using mass-spectrometry based metabolomics. Due to unmeasurably low levels of relevant metabolites, one sample was omitted from parts a) and b), and two samples were omitted from parts c) and d).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Plasma metabolomics for subjects on enteral nutrition over time, demonstrating a) increasing amino acids, b) increasing urea cycle metabolites, c) increasing RNA synthetic metabolites, and d) restoration of antioxidant balance.ϕ ϕ Generated using mass-spectrometry based metabolomics.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Plasma metabolomics for subjects on enteral nutrition over time, demonstrating a) increasing amino acids, b) increasing urea cycle metabolites, c) increasing RNA synthetic metabolites, and d) restoration of antioxidant balance.ϕ ϕ Generated using mass-spectrometry based metabolomics.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Plasma metabolomics for subjects on enteral nutrition over time, demonstrating a) increasing amino acids, b) low levels of urea cycle metabolites, and c) decreasing essential omega fatty-acids and increased endogenous fatty-acid transport (carnitine).ϕ ϕ Generated using mass-spectrometry based metabolomics.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Plasma metabolomics for subjects on enteral nutrition over time, demonstrating a) increasing amino acids, b) low levels of urea cycle metabolites, and c) decreasing essential omega fatty-acids and increased endogenous fatty-acid transport (carnitine).ϕ ϕ Generated using mass-spectrometry based metabolomics.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Singer P, Pichard C. Reconciling divergent results of the latest parenteral nutrition studies in the ICU. Curr Op Clin Nutr. 2013;16(2):187–193. - PubMed
    1. Huynh D, Chapman MJ, Nguyen NQ. Nutrition support in the critically ill. Curr Op Gastroenterol. 2013;29(2):208–215. - PubMed
    1. Rice TW, Wheeler AP, Thompson BT, Steingrub J, Hite RD, Moss M, Morris A, Dong N, Rock P. Initial trophic vs full enteral feeding in patients with acute lung injury: the EDEN randomized trial. JAMA. 2012;307(8):795–803. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Singer P, Anbar R, Cohen J, Sharpio H, Shalita-Chesner M, Lev S, Grozovski E, Theilla M, Frishman S, Madar Z. The tight calorie control study (TICACOS): a prospective, randomized, controlled pilot study of nutritional support in critically ill patients. Int Care Med. 2011;37(4):601–609. - PubMed
    1. Andrews PJ, Avenell A, Noble DW, Campbell MK, Croal BL, Simpson WG, Vale LD, Battison CG, Jenkinson DJ, Cook JA. Randomised trial of glutamine, selenium, or both, to supplement parenteral nutrition for critically ill patients. BMJ. 2011;342:d1542. - PubMed

Publication types