Spatial frequencies and the cerebral hemispheres: contrast sensitivity, visible persistence, and letter classification
- PMID: 2813029
- DOI: 10.3758/bf03210859
Spatial frequencies and the cerebral hemispheres: contrast sensitivity, visible persistence, and letter classification
Abstract
The hypothesis that the two cerebral hemispheres are specialized for processing different visual spatial frequencies was investigated in three experiments. No differences between the left and right visual fields were found for: (1) contrast-sensitivity functions measured binocularly with vertical gratings ranging from 0.5 to 12 cycles per degree (cpd); (2) visible persistence durations for 1- and 10-cpd gratings measured with a stimulus alternation method; and (3) accuracy (d') and reaction times to correctly identify digitally filtered letters as targets (L or H) or nontargets (T or F). One significant difference, however, was found: In Experiment 3, a higher decision criterion (beta) was used when filtered letters were identified in the right visual field than when they were identified in the left. The letters were filtered with annular, 1-octave band-pass filters with center spatial frequencies of 1, 2, 4, 8, and 16 cpd. Combining four center frequencies with three letter sizes (0.5 degrees, 1 degree, and 2 degrees high) made some stimuli equivalent in distal spatial frequency (cycles per object) and some equivalent in proximal spatial frequency (cycles per degree). The effective stimulus in the third experiment seemed to be proximal spatial frequency (cycles per degree) not distal (cycles per object). We conclude that each cerebral hemisphere processes visual spatial frequency information with equal accuracy but that different decision rules are used.
Similar articles
-
Spatial-frequency characteristics of letter identification in central and peripheral vision.Vision Res. 2002 Aug;42(18):2137-152. doi: 10.1016/s0042-6989(02)00092-5. Vision Res. 2002. PMID: 12207975
-
Object spatial frequencies, retinal spatial frequencies, noise, and the efficiency of letter discrimination.Vision Res. 1991;31(7-8):1399-415. doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(91)90060-i. Vision Res. 1991. PMID: 1891827
-
The cerebral balance of power: confrontation or cooperation?J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1982 Apr;8(2):253-72. doi: 10.1037//0096-1523.8.2.253. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1982. PMID: 6461721
-
[Interhemispheric differences in the spatial-frequency description of images and the consequences for visual recognition].Zh Vyssh Nerv Deiat Im I P Pavlova. 1990 Sep-Oct;40(5):915-24. Zh Vyssh Nerv Deiat Im I P Pavlova. 1990. PMID: 1964337 Review. Russian.
-
[Hemispheric interaction during the processing of spatial information].Usp Fiziol Nauk. 1993 Oct-Dec;24(4):3-11. Usp Fiziol Nauk. 1993. PMID: 8237104 Review. Russian.
Cited by
-
Hemispheric differences are found in the identification, but not the detection, of low versus high spatial frequencies.Percept Psychophys. 1990 Oct;48(4):297-306. doi: 10.3758/bf03206680. Percept Psychophys. 1990. PMID: 2243753
-
Persistent hemispheric differences in the perceptual selection of spatial frequencies.J Cogn Neurosci. 2014 Sep;26(9):2021-7. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00606. Epub 2014 Mar 25. J Cogn Neurosci. 2014. PMID: 24666124 Free PMC article.
-
Convergence of the visual field split: hemispheric modeling of face and object recognition.J Cogn Neurosci. 2008 Dec;20(12):2298-307. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2008.20162. J Cogn Neurosci. 2008. PMID: 18457514 Free PMC article.
-
Hemisphericsymmetries in the identification of band-pass filtered letters Reply to Christman et al. (1997).Psychon Bull Rev. 1997 Jun;4(2):285-7. doi: 10.3758/BF03209407. Psychon Bull Rev. 1997. PMID: 21331839
-
Category learning induces position invariance of pattern recognition across the visual field.Proc Biol Sci. 2008 Feb 22;275(1633):403-10. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2007.1492. Proc Biol Sci. 2008. PMID: 18077251 Free PMC article.