Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Mar:67:1-10.
doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2017.01.013. Epub 2017 Jan 25.

Development and empirical user-centered evaluation of semantically-based query recommendation for an electronic health record search engine

Affiliations

Development and empirical user-centered evaluation of semantically-based query recommendation for an electronic health record search engine

David A Hanauer et al. J Biomed Inform. 2017 Mar.

Abstract

Objective: The utility of biomedical information retrieval environments can be severely limited when users lack expertise in constructing effective search queries. To address this issue, we developed a computer-based query recommendation algorithm that suggests semantically interchangeable terms based on an initial user-entered query. In this study, we assessed the value of this approach, which has broad applicability in biomedical information retrieval, by demonstrating its application as part of a search engine that facilitates retrieval of information from electronic health records (EHRs).

Materials and methods: The query recommendation algorithm utilizes MetaMap to identify medical concepts from search queries and indexed EHR documents. Synonym variants from UMLS are used to expand the concepts along with a synonym set curated from historical EHR search logs. The empirical study involved 33 clinicians and staff who evaluated the system through a set of simulated EHR search tasks. User acceptance was assessed using the widely used technology acceptance model.

Results: The search engine's performance was rated consistently higher with the query recommendation feature turned on vs. off. The relevance of computer-recommended search terms was also rated high, and in most cases the participants had not thought of these terms on their own. The questions on perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use received overwhelmingly positive responses. A vast majority of the participants wanted the query recommendation feature to be available to assist in their day-to-day EHR search tasks.

Discussion and conclusion: Challenges persist for users to construct effective search queries when retrieving information from biomedical documents including those from EHRs. This study demonstrates that semantically-based query recommendation is a viable solution to addressing this challenge.

Keywords: Electronic health records (E05.318.308.940.968.625.500); Information retrieval systems (L01.700.508.300); Query expansion; Query recommendation; Search engine (L01.470.875); Unified Medical Language System (L01.453.245.945.800).

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Components and Information Flow of the Query Recommendation Algorithm
EHR documents (a) are matched to UMLS terms using the output of the MetaMap natural language processing software as well as to terms in a locally developed empiric synonym set (b, c). These document terms are then indexed using Lemur (d, e). In a similar manner, with the query suggestion feature turned on, user-supplied queries (j) are also matched to UMLS and ESS terms (k, l), but generic UMLS semantic types are removed (m) to provide matching on the more relevant clinical concepts. This results in an expanded query (n) that is compared to the index (e) for subsequent document ranking (f) and presentation to the user (g). When the query suggestion feature was turned off (h), parsed queries (l) are compared directly with the parsed terms in the index (e) without any synonym expansion. When the query suggestion was turned on (i), the parsed terms were expanded using the concepts to which they mapped. In either mode (on or off) the user could revise their queries (o) and repeat their search as many times as desired.
Figure 2
Figure 2. The Main User Interface of EHR-SE, with the Query Recommendation Feature Turned Off
Figure 3
Figure 3. The Main User Interface of EHR-SE, with the Query Recommendation Feature Turned On

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Adler-Milstein J, DesRoches CM, Furukawa MF, et al. More Than Half of US Hospitals Have At Least A Basic EHR, But Stage 2 Criteria Remain Challenging For Most. Health Aff (Millwood) 2014;33(9):1664–1671. - PubMed
    1. Berner ES, Moss J. Informatics challenges for the impending patient information explosion. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2005;12(6):614–617. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Biron P, Metzger MH, Pezet C, Sebban C, Barthuet E, Durand T. An information retrieval system for computerized patient records in the context of a daily hospital practice: the example of the Leon Berard Cancer Center (France) Appl Clin Inform. 2014;5(1):191–205. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gregg W, Jirjis J, Lorenzi NM, Giuse D. StarTracker: an integrated, web-based clinical search engine. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2003;855 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hanauer DA, Mei Q, Law J, Khanna R, Zheng K. Supporting information retrieval from electronic health records: A report of University of Michigan's nine-year experience in developing and using the Electronic Medical Record Search Engine (EMERSE) J Biomed Inform. 2015;55:290–300. - PMC - PubMed