PRECISION MANAGEMENT OF LOCALIZED PROSTATE CANCER
- PMID: 28133630
- PMCID: PMC5267484
- DOI: 10.1080/23808993.2016.1267562
PRECISION MANAGEMENT OF LOCALIZED PROSTATE CANCER
Abstract
Introduction: The vast majority of men who are diagnosed with prostate cancer die of other causes, highlighting the importance of determining which patient has a risk of death from prostate cancer. Precision management of prostate cancer patients includes distinguishing which men have potentially lethal disease and employing strategies for determining which treatment modality appropriately balances the desire to achieve a durable response while preventing unnecessary overtreatment.
Areas covered: In this review, we highlight precision approaches to risk assessment and a context for the precision-guided application of definitive therapy. We focus on three dilemmas relevant to the diagnosis of localized prostate cancer: screening, the decision to treat, and postoperative management.
Expert commentary: In the last five years, numerous precision tools have emerged with potential benefit to the patient. However, to achieve optimal outcome, the decision to employ one or more of these tests must be considered in the context of prevailing conventional factors. Moreover, performance and interpretation of a molecular or imaging precision test remains practitioner-dependent. The next five years will witness increased marriage of molecular and imaging biomarkers for improved multi-modal diagnosis and discrimination of disease that is aggressive versus truly indolent.
Keywords: clinical management; high-risk; imaging biomarkers; molecular biomarkers; mpMRI; prostate cancer; risk stratification.
Similar articles
-
Molecular biomarkers to guide precision medicine in localized prostate cancer.Expert Rev Mol Diagn. 2017 Aug;17(8):791-804. doi: 10.1080/14737159.2017.1345627. Expert Rev Mol Diagn. 2017. PMID: 28635333 Review.
-
The Impact of Positron Emission Tomography Imaging and Tumor Molecular Profiling on Risk Stratification, Treatment Choice, and Oncological Outcomes of Patients with Primary or Relapsed Prostate Cancer: An International Collaborative Review of the Existing Literature.Eur Urol Oncol. 2024 Feb;7(1):27-43. doi: 10.1016/j.euo.2023.06.002. Epub 2023 Jul 8. Eur Urol Oncol. 2024. PMID: 37423774 Review.
-
Multiparametric MRI to improve detection of prostate cancer compared with transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy alone: the PROMIS study.Health Technol Assess. 2018 Jul;22(39):1-176. doi: 10.3310/hta22390. Health Technol Assess. 2018. PMID: 30040065 Free PMC article.
-
Prostate Cancer Risk Assessment in Biopsy-naïve Patients: The Rotterdam Prostate Cancer Risk Calculator in Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Transrectal Ultrasound (TRUS) Fusion Biopsy and Systematic TRUS Biopsy.Eur Urol Oncol. 2018 Jun;1(2):109-117. doi: 10.1016/j.euo.2018.02.010. Epub 2018 May 15. Eur Urol Oncol. 2018. PMID: 31100233
-
Multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging as a management decision tool.Transl Androl Urol. 2017 Jun;6(3):472-482. doi: 10.21037/tau.2017.05.22. Transl Androl Urol. 2017. PMID: 28725589 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Assessment of the compliance with minimum acceptable technical parameters proposed by PI-RADS v2 guidelines in multiparametric prostate MRI acquisition in tertiary referral hospitals in the Republic of Turkey.Diagn Interv Radiol. 2019 Nov;25(6):421-427. doi: 10.5152/dir.2019.18537. Diagn Interv Radiol. 2019. PMID: 31650967 Free PMC article.
-
Low Abundance of Circulating Tumor DNA in Localized Prostate Cancer.JCO Precis Oncol. 2019;3:PO.19.00176. doi: 10.1200/PO.19.00176. Epub 2019 Sep 9. JCO Precis Oncol. 2019. PMID: 31528835 Free PMC article.
-
Molecular correlates of intermediate- and high-risk localized prostate cancer.Urol Oncol. 2018 Aug;36(8):368-374. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2017.12.022. Epub 2018 Mar 2. Urol Oncol. 2018. PMID: 30103901 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Robinson JG, Hodges EA, Davison J. Prostate-specific antigen screening: a critical review of current research and guidelines. J Am Assoc Nurse Pract. 2014;26:574–81. - PubMed
-
- Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2016. CA Cancer J Clin. 2016;66:7–30. - PubMed
-
- Safdieh JJ, Schwartz D, Weiner JP, Nwokedi E, Schreiber D. The need for more aggressive therapy for men with Gleason 9–10 disease compared to Gleason </=8 high-risk prostate cancer. Tumori. 2016;102:168–73. - PubMed
-
- Wong MC, Goggins WB, Wang HH, Fung FD, Leung C, Wong SY, Ng CF, Sung JJ. Global Incidence and Mortality for Prostate Cancer: Analysis of Temporal Patterns and Trends in 36 Countries. European urology. 2016 - PubMed
-
- Welch HG, Gorski DH, Albertsen PC. Trends in Metastatic Breast and Prostate Cancer--Lessons in Cancer Dynamics. N Engl J Med. 2015;373:1685–7. - PubMed
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources