Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Mar;19(3):155-163.
doi: 10.1089/dia.2016.0421. Epub 2017 Jan 30.

Glucose Outcomes with the In-Home Use of a Hybrid Closed-Loop Insulin Delivery System in Adolescents and Adults with Type 1 Diabetes

Affiliations

Glucose Outcomes with the In-Home Use of a Hybrid Closed-Loop Insulin Delivery System in Adolescents and Adults with Type 1 Diabetes

Satish K Garg et al. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2017 Mar.

Abstract

Background: The safety and effectiveness of the in-home use of a hybrid closed-loop (HCL) system that automatically increases, decreases, and suspends insulin delivery in response to continuous glucose monitoring were investigated.

Methods: Adolescents (n = 30, ages 14-21 years) and adults (n = 94, ages 22-75 years) with type 1 diabetes participated in a multicenter (nine sites in the United States, one site in Israel) pivotal trial. The Medtronic MiniMed® 670G system was used during a 2-week run-in phase without HCL control, or Auto Mode, enabled (Manual Mode) and, thereafter, with Auto Mode enabled during a 3-month study phase. A supervised hotel stay (6 days/5 nights) that included a 24-h frequent blood sample testing with a reference measurement (i-STAT) occurred during the study phase.

Results: Adolescents (mean ± standard deviation [SD] 16.5 ± 2.29 years of age and 7.7 ± 4.15 years of diabetes) used the system for a median 75.8% (interquartile range [IQR] 68.0%-88.4%) of the time (2977 patient-days). Adults (mean ± SD 44.6 ± 12.79 years of age and 26.4 ± 12.43 years of diabetes) used the system for a median 88.0% (IQR 77.6%-92.7%) of the time (9412 patient-days). From baseline run-in to the end of study phase, adolescent and adult HbA1c levels decreased from 7.7% ± 0.8% to 7.1% ± 0.6% (P < 0.001) and from 7.3% ± 0.9% to 6.8% ± 0.6% (P < 0.001, Wilcoxon signed-rank test), respectively. The proportion of overall in-target (71-180 mg/dL) sensor glucose (SG) values increased from 60.4% ± 10.9% to 67.2% ± 8.2% (P < 0.001) in adolescents and from 68.8% ± 11.9% to 73.8% ± 8.4% (P < 0.001) in adults. During the hotel stay, the proportion of in-target i-STAT® blood glucose values was 67.4% ± 27.7% compared to SG values of 72.0% ± 11.6% for adolescents and 74.2% ± 17.5% compared to 76.9% ± 8.3% for adults. There were no severe hypoglycemic or diabetic ketoacidosis events in either cohort.

Conclusions: HCL therapy was safe during in-home use by adolescents and adults and the study phase demonstrated increased time in target, and reductions in HbA1c, hyperglycemia and hypoglycemia, compared to baseline.

Trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT02463097.

Keywords: Continuous glucose monitoring; Hybrid closed loop; Hyperglycemia; Hypoglycemia; Insulin pump; Sensor; Type 1 diabetes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The following authors: Drs. Garg, Weinzimer, Buckingham, Bode, Bailey, Brazg, Ilany, Slover, Anderson, and Bergenstal served as principal investigators for this study and received compensation and research support from Medtronic. Dr. Tamborlane served as a consultant in the study and received compensation from Medtronic. Drs. Grosman, Roy, Cordero, Shin, Lee, and Kaufman, employees of Medtronic, participated in data analysis and/or critical review of the manuscript.

Figures

<b>FIG. 1.</b>
FIG. 1.
Sensor glucose profiles during the run-in and study phase. Median and interquartile range of sensor glucose values throughout the day and night, beginning at midnight (00, on x-axis), in (A) adolescents and (B) adults. The gray band and dotted line represent data from the run-in phase; the pink band and solid line represent data from the study phase.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Miller KM, Foster NC, Beck RW, et al. : Current state of type 1 diabetes treatment in the U.S.: Updated data from the T1D Exchange clinic registry. Diabetes Care 2015;38:971–978 - PubMed
    1. Weinzimer SA, Steil GM, Swan KL, et al. : Fully automated closed-loop insulin delivery versus semiautomated hybrid control in pediatric patients with type 1 diabetes using an artificial pancreas. Diabetes Care 2008;31:934–939 - PubMed
    1. Trevitt S, Simpson S, Wood A: Artificial pancreas device systems for the closed-loop control of type 1 diabetes: what systems are in development? J Diabetes Sci Technol 2016;10:714–723 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kovatchev BP, Breton M, Man CD, et al. : In silico preclinical trials: a proof of concept in closed-loop control of type 1 diabetes. J Diabetes Sci Technol 2009;3:44–55 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Atlas E, Nimri R, Miller S, et al. : MD-logic artificial pancreas system: a pilot study in adults with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care 2010;33:1072–1076 - PMC - PubMed

Associated data