Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Mar;20(3):393-395.
doi: 10.1038/nn.4492. Epub 2017 Jan 30.

[18F]FDG PET signal is driven by astroglial glutamate transport

Affiliations

[18F]FDG PET signal is driven by astroglial glutamate transport

Eduardo R Zimmer et al. Nat Neurosci. 2017 Mar.

Abstract

Contributions of glial cells to neuroenergetics have been the focus of extensive debate. Here we provide positron emission tomography evidence that activation of astrocytic glutamate transport via the excitatory amino acid transporter GLT-1 triggers widespread but graded glucose uptake in the rodent brain. Our results highlight the need for a reevaluation of the interpretation of [18F]FDG positron emission tomography data, whereby astrocytes would be recognized as contributing to the [18F]FDG signal.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Competing Financial Interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Astrocytic glutamate transport activation via GLT-1 triggers cerebral [18F]FDG uptake
(a) Study design: rats received a tail vein injection of saline or CEF (200 mg/kg) 70 minutes before the scan. Thirty minutes later they received an [18F]FDG tail vein injection and were allowed to freely move in their cages (awake) during a 40 minutes uptake phase. After that period, a static scan of 10 minutes was acquired. (b) Whole brain [18F]FDG uptake. (c) Statistical parametric images (t-statistical map (CEF challenge > baseline) overlaid on a histological template. (d) Brain mask showing volume of interest (VOIs) overlaid on a histological template. Regional [18F]FDG uptake in the prefrontal (e) and temporo-parietal cortices (f), hippocampus (g), striatum (h), thalamus (i) and cerebellum (j). Regional percentage of change in VOIs (challenge > baseline, k). n = 10 rats per group. *p < 0.05, and **p < 0.01. Two tailed paired t-test. Data are presented as mean values ± s.d. and individual scatter plots. Note that each region has a correspondent scatter plot color, which follows regions defined in the VOIs mask; prefrontal cortex (red), temporo-parietal cortex (green), hippocampus (dark-purple), striatum (light-green), thalamus (light-purple) and cerebellum (yellow).
Figure 2
Figure 2. Astrocytic glutamate transport activation via GLT-1 disrupts region-toregion metabolic synchronicity
Cross-correlation matrices: inter-subject cross-correlation maps displaying region-to-region associations in the baseline (a) and CEF challenge (b) conditions. Metabolic networks: 3D brain surfaces displaying large-scale metabolic cross-correlation maps in the baseline (c) and in the CEF challenge (d) conditions. n = 10 rats per group. Data presented as correlation values with Bonferonni corrected threshold, p < 0.05.
Figure 3
Figure 3. Astrocytic glutamate transport activation via GLT-1 uncouples [18F]FDG uptake and cerebral blood flow response
(a) 3D brain surface displaying highest effects of CEF challenge and probe locations. (b) Temporal resting CBF flow analysis during baseline and after injection of saline or CEF in the barrel (repeated measure one-way ANOVA, p = 0.2714) and prefrontal cortices (repeated measure one-way ANOVA, p = 0.6495). (c) Evoked CBF analysis in the barrel cortex (repeated measure two-way ANOVA, interaction: p > 0.999; whiskers stimulation effect: p < 0.001; group effect: p = 0.6170). n= 5 per group for evoked CBF; n = 5 per group for resting CBF in the PFC; and n = 4 per group for resting CBF in the barrel cortex. Data are presented as mean values ± s.e.m (shadows).

Comment in

References

    1. Sokoloff L. Developmental neuroscience. 1993;15:194–206. - PubMed
    1. Mazzilotta JC, Phelps ME, Miller J, Kuhl DE. Neurology. 1981;31:503–516. - PubMed
    1. Mosconi L, et al. Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine. 2008;49:390–398. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Nehlig A, Coles JA. Glia. 2007;55:1238–1250. - PubMed
    1. Figley CR, Stroman PW. The European journal of neuroscience. 2011;33:577–588. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources