Evaluation of a Quality Improvement Resource for Public Health Practitioners
- PMID: 28135430
- PMCID: PMC5349484
- DOI: 10.1177/0033354916689609
Evaluation of a Quality Improvement Resource for Public Health Practitioners
Abstract
Objectives: Quality improvement is a critical mechanism to manage public health agency performance and to strengthen accountability for public funds. The objective of this study was to evaluate a relatively new quality improvement resource, the Public Health Quality Improvement Exchange (PHQIX), a free online communication platform dedicated to making public health quality improvement information accessible to practitioners.
Methods: We conducted an internet-based survey of registered PHQIX users (n = 536 respondents) in 2013 and key informant interviews with PHQIX frequent users (n = 21) in 2014, in the United States. We assessed use of the PHQIX website, user engagement and satisfaction, communication and knowledge exchange, use of information, and impact on quality improvement capacity and accreditation readiness.
Results: Of 462 respondents, 369 (79.9%) browsed quality improvement initiatives, making it the most commonly used site feature, and respondents described PHQIX as a near-unique source for real-world quality improvement examples. Respondents were satisfied with the quality and breadth of topics and relevance to their settings (average satisfaction scores, 3.9-4.1 [where 5 was the most satisfied]). Of 407 respondents, 237 (58.2%) said that they had put into practice information learned on PHQIX, and 209 of 405 (51.6%) said that PHQIX had helped to improve quality improvement capacity. Fewer than half of respondents used the commenting function, the Community Forum, and the Ask an Expert feature.
Conclusions: Findings suggest that PHQIX, particularly descriptions of the quality improvement initiatives, is a valued resource for public health practitioners. Users reported sharing information with colleagues and applying what they learned to their own work. These findings may relate to other efforts to disseminate quality improvement knowledge.
Keywords: evaluation; public health practice; quality improvement.
Conflict of interest statement
Figures
References
-
- Riley WJ, Beitsch LM, Parsons HM, Moran JW. Quality improvement in public health: where are we now? J Public Health Manag Pract. 2010;16(1):1–2. - PubMed
-
- Beitsch LM, Riley W, Bender K. Embedding quality improvement into accreditation: evolving from theory to practice. J Public Health Manag Pract. 2014;20(1):57–60. - PubMed
-
- Madamala K, Sellers K, Beitsch LM, Pearsol J, Jarris P. Quality improvement and accreditation readiness in state public health agencies. J Public Health Manag Pract. 2012;18(1):9–18. - PubMed
-
- Davis MV. Opportunities to advance quality improvement in public health. J Public Health Manag Pract. 2010;16(1):8–10. - PubMed
-
- Public Health Foundation. Quality improvement resources from PHF’s learning resource center. http://www.phf.org/resourcestools/Pages/Quality_Improvement_Resources_fr.... Accessed December 2, 2016.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
