Antimicrobial Activity of High-Proportion Cefepime-Tazobactam (WCK 4282) against a Large Number of Gram-Negative Isolates Collected Worldwide in 2014
- PMID: 28137811
- PMCID: PMC5365660
- DOI: 10.1128/AAC.02409-16
Antimicrobial Activity of High-Proportion Cefepime-Tazobactam (WCK 4282) against a Large Number of Gram-Negative Isolates Collected Worldwide in 2014
Abstract
Cefepime-tazobactam (WCK 4282) is currently under clinical development for use at a dosage of 2 g/2 g every 8 h. A total of 7,981 isolates were collected from 146 medical centers (39 countries) in 2014 as a part of the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program, and their susceptibilities to cefepime-tazobactam (with tazobactam at fixed concentrations of 4 and 8 μg/ml) were tested by a reference broth microdilution method. Isolates were mainly from patients with pneumonia (29.5%) and bloodstream infections (26.9%). Cefepime-tazobactam (with tazobactam at a fixed concentration of 8 μg/ml) and cefepime inhibited 96.9 and 87.9% of Enterobacteriaceae strains at ≤8 μg/ml. The activity of cefepime-tazobactam against Enterobacteriaceae strains was comparable to that of meropenem (96.7% of isolates were susceptible) and greater than that of piperacillin-tazobactam (87.7% susceptible). All Enterobacteriaceae species from the United States except Klebsiella pneumoniae had >99.0% of isolates inhibited by cefepime-tazobactam at ≤8/8 μg/ml. The prevalence of the extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-screening-positive phenotype was the highest among Escherichia coli isolates in China (66.3%) and among K. pneumoniae isolates (58.0%) in Latin America. Cefepime-tazobactam at ≤8/8 μg/ml inhibited 98.7 and 71.3% of ESBL-screening-positive phenotype E. coli strains and K. pneumoniae strains, respectively. Meropenem showed limited activity against ESBL-screening-positive phenotype K. pneumoniae strains (69.6% susceptible). Cefepime-tazobactam was active against Enterobacter spp. (MIC50 and MIC90, 0.06 and 0.5 μg/ml, respectively), including ceftazidime-nonsusceptible isolates (96.1% of isolates were inhibited by cefepime-tazobactam at ≤8/8 μg/ml). The activity of cefepime-tazobactam against Pseudomonas aeruginosa (82.4 and 91.6% of isolates were inhibited by cefepime-tazobactam at ≤8/8 and ≤16/8 μg/ml, respectively) was comparable to that of meropenem and piperacillin-tazobactam (79.2% susceptible). In summary, cefepime-tazobactam was highly active against P. aeruginosa and Enterobacteriaceae strains, including ESBL-screening-positive phenotype E. coli strains and ceftazidime-nonsusceptible Enterobacter spp. These results support the further clinical development of the cefepime-tazobactam combination.
Keywords: cefepime-tazobactam.
Copyright © 2017 American Society for Microbiology.
Similar articles
-
Antimicrobial Activity of Ceftazidime-Avibactam against Gram-Negative Bacteria Isolated from Patients Hospitalized with Pneumonia in U.S. Medical Centers, 2011 to 2015.Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2017 Mar 24;61(4):e02083-16. doi: 10.1128/AAC.02083-16. Print 2017 Apr. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2017. PMID: 28069649 Free PMC article.
-
Ceftolozane/tazobactam activity tested against aerobic Gram-negative organisms isolated from intra-abdominal and urinary tract infections in European and United States hospitals (2012).J Infect. 2014 Sep;69(3):266-77. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2014.04.004. Epub 2014 Apr 26. J Infect. 2014. PMID: 24780763
-
In Vitro Activity of Cefepime-Enmetazobactam against Gram-Negative Isolates Collected from U.S. and European Hospitals during 2014-2015.Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2019 Jun 24;63(7):e00514-19. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00514-19. Print 2019 Jul. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2019. PMID: 30988152 Free PMC article.
-
The Use of Noncarbapenem β-Lactams for the Treatment of Extended-Spectrum β-Lactamase Infections.Clin Infect Dis. 2017 Apr 1;64(7):972-980. doi: 10.1093/cid/cix034. Clin Infect Dis. 2017. PMID: 28362938 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Extended spectrum β-lactamase producers among nosocomial Enterobacteriaceae in Latin America.Braz J Infect Dis. 2014 Jul-Aug;18(4):421-33. doi: 10.1016/j.bjid.2013.10.005. Epub 2014 Jan 3. Braz J Infect Dis. 2014. PMID: 24389277 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Microbial Resistance to Antibiotics and Effective Antibiotherapy.Biomedicines. 2022 May 12;10(5):1121. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines10051121. Biomedicines. 2022. PMID: 35625857 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Epidemiology and Diagnostics of Carbapenem Resistance in Gram-negative Bacteria.Clin Infect Dis. 2019 Nov 13;69(Suppl 7):S521-S528. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciz824. Clin Infect Dis. 2019. PMID: 31724045 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Unorthodox Parenteral β-Lactam and β-Lactamase Inhibitor Combinations: Flouting Antimicrobial Stewardship and Compromising Patient Care.Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2020 Apr 21;64(5):e00168-20. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00168-20. Print 2020 Apr 21. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2020. PMID: 32122901 Free PMC article.
-
Biochemical exploration of β-lactamase inhibitors.Front Genet. 2023 Jan 17;13:1060736. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2022.1060736. eCollection 2022. Front Genet. 2023. PMID: 36733944 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Pharmacokinetics-Pharmacodynamics of Enmetazobactam Combined with Cefepime in a Neutropenic Murine Thigh Infection Model.Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2020 May 21;64(6):e00078-20. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00078-20. Print 2020 May 21. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2020. PMID: 32253212 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Food and Drug Administration. 2015. Maxipime package insert. Food and Drug Administration, Rockville, MD: http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2015/050821s004lbl.pdf Accessed 2 September 2016.
-
- Barradell LB, Bryson HM. 1994. Cefepime. A review of its antibacterial activity, pharmacokinetic properties and therapeutic use. Drugs 47:471–505. - PubMed
-
- Sader HS, Fritsche TR, Jones RN. 2005. Potency and spectrum trends for cefepime tested against 65746 clinical bacterial isolates collected in North American medical centers: results from the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program (1998-2003). Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 52:265–273. doi:10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2005.02.003. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Dudley MN, Ambrose PG, Bhavnani SM, Craig WA, Ferraro MJ, Jones RN. 2013. Background and rationale for revised Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute interpretive criteria (breakpoints) for Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. I. Cephalosporins and aztreonam. Clin Infect Dis 56:1301–1309. doi:10.1093/cid/cit017. - DOI - PubMed
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Molecular Biology Databases
Miscellaneous