Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017;32(6):673-678.
doi: 10.1007/s11606-017-3990-5. Epub 2017 Jan 30.

Publication Rates of Abstracts Presented at the Society of General Internal Medicine Annual Meeting

Heidi M Egloff  1 , Colin P West  2   3 , Amy T Wang  4 , Katie M Lowe  5 , Jithinraj Edakkanambeth Varayil  6 , Thomas J Beckman  2 , Adam P Sawatsky  7
Affiliations

Publication Rates of Abstracts Presented at the Society of General Internal Medicine Annual Meeting

Heidi M Egloff et al. J Gen Intern Med. 2017.

Abstract

Background: Abstracts accepted at scientific meetings are often not subsequently published. Data on publication rates are largely from subspecialty and surgical studies.

Objective: The aims of this study were to 1) determine publication rates of abstracts presented at a general internal medicine meeting; 2) describe research activity among academic general internists; 3) identify factors associated with publication and with the impact factor of the journal of publication; and 4) evaluate for publication bias.

Design: Retrospective cohort study.

Participants: All scientific abstracts presented at the Society of General Internal Medicine 2009 Annual Meeting.

Main measures: Publication rates were determined by searching for full-text publications in MEDLINE. Data were abstracted regarding authors' institution, research topic category, number of study sites, sample size, study design, statistical significance (p value and confidence interval) in abstract and publication, journal of publication, publication date, and journal impact factor.

Key results: Of the 578 abstracts analyzed, 274 (47.4%) were subsequently published as a full article in a peer-reviewed journal indexed in MEDLINE. In a multivariable model adjusting for institution site, research topic, number of study sites, study design, sample size, and abstract results, publication rates for academic general internists were highest in the areas of medical education (52.5%, OR 5.05, 95% CI 1.57-17.25, reference group Veterans Affairs (VA)-based research, publication rate 36.7%), mental health/substance use (67.7%, OR 4.16, 95% CI 1.39-13.06), and aging/geriatrics/end of life (65.7%, OR 3.31, 95% CI 1.15-9.94, p = 0.01 across topics). Publication rates were higher for multicenter studies than single-institution studies (52.4% vs. 40.4%, OR 1.66, 95% CI 1.10-2.52, p = 0.04 across categories). Randomized controlled trials had higher publication rates than other study designs (66.7% vs. 45.9%, OR 2.72, 95% CI 1.30-5.94, p = 0.03 across study designs). Studies with positive results did not predict higher publication rates than negative studies (OR 0.89, 95% CI 0.6-1.31, p = 0.21).

Conclusions: This study demonstrated that 47.4% of abstracts presented at a general internal medicine national conference were subsequently published in a peer-reviewed journal indexed in MEDLINE.

Keywords: abstracts; general internal medicine; impact factor; publication bias; publication rates.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

    1. Scherer RW, Langenberg P, von Elm E. Full publication of results initially presented in abstracts. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007;(2):MR000005. - PubMed
    1. Hopewell S, McDonald S. Full publication of trials initially reported as abstracts in the Australian and New Zealand Journal of Medicine 1980–2000. Intern Med J. 2003;33(4):192–4. doi: 10.1046/j.1445-5994.2003.00353.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Koene HR, Overbeke AJ. The scientific value of society reports in the Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Geneeskunde. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 1994;138(37):1868–71. - PubMed
    1. Sawatsky AP, Beckman TJ, Edakkanambeth Varayil J, Mandrekar JN, Reed DA, Wang AT. Association between study quality and publication rates of medical education abstracts presented at the society of general internal medicine annual meeting. J Gen Intern Med. 2015;30(8):1172–7. doi: 10.1007/s11606-015-3269-7. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Armstrong K, Keating NL, Landry M, Crotty BH, Phillips RS, Selker HP. Academic general internal medicine: a mission for the future. J Gen Intern Med. 2013;28(6):845–51. doi: 10.1007/s11606-013-2334-3. - DOI - PMC - PubMed