Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Jan 31:8:14251.
doi: 10.1038/ncomms14251.

Convergent recombination suppression suggests role of sexual selection in guppy sex chromosome formation

Affiliations

Convergent recombination suppression suggests role of sexual selection in guppy sex chromosome formation

Alison E Wright et al. Nat Commun. .

Abstract

Sex chromosomes evolve once recombination is halted between a homologous pair of chromosomes. The dominant model of sex chromosome evolution posits that recombination is suppressed between emerging X and Y chromosomes in order to resolve sexual conflict. Here we test this model using whole genome and transcriptome resequencing data in the guppy, a model for sexual selection with many Y-linked colour traits. We show that although the nascent Y chromosome encompasses nearly half of the linkage group, there has been no perceptible degradation of Y chromosome gene content or activity. Using replicate wild populations with differing levels of sexually antagonistic selection for colour, we also show that sexual selection leads to greater expansion of the non-recombining region and increased Y chromosome divergence. These results provide empirical support for longstanding models of sex chromosome catalysis, and suggest an important role for sexual selection and sexual conflict in genome evolution.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Distribution of sex differences in coverage and SNP density for all chromosomes.
The X chromosome is in purple. Horizontal and vertical lines denote interquartile ranges.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Male and female coverage characteristics of guppy sex chromosome.
(a) Moving average of coverage differences between male and female reads based on sliding window analysis (window size of 40 scaffolds). Ninety-five per cent confidence intervals based on bootstrapping autosomal estimates are in grey. (b) Male (blue) and female (red) coverage for the X chromosome. For both panels, dark purple indicates the region of the sex chromosomes with the greatest X-Y sequence divergence, where coverage is significantly less in males (Stratum I, 22–25 Mb).
Figure 3
Figure 3. Male and female SNP density and expression differences on guppy sex chromosome.
(a) Moving average of male:female SNP density based on sliding window analysis (window size of 40 scaffolds). Ninety-five per cent confidence intervals based on bootstrapping autosomal estimates are in grey. (b) Male (blue) and female (red) expression of genes along the X chromosome (window size of 40 genes). Dark purple indicates the region of the sex chromosomes with the greatest X-Y sequence divergence, where coverage is significantly less in males (Stratum I, 22–25 Mb) (see Fig. 2), light purple indicates the region with less X-Y differentiation, where there is a significant excess of male SNPs (Stratum II, 15–22 Mb).
Figure 4
Figure 4. Male:female SNP density for the X chromosome across upstream (orange) and downstream (black) guppy populations.
(a,c and e) Moving averages of normalized SNP density across the X chromosome based on sliding window analysis (window size of 40 genes) for Yarra (a), Quare (c) and Aripo (e) watersheds. Ninety-five per cent confidence intervals based on bootstrapping autosomal estimates are in grey. Dark purple indicates the region of the sex chromosomes with the greatest X-Y sequence divergence, where coverage is significantly less in laboratory population males (Stratum I, 22–25 Mb) (see Fig. 2), light purple indicates the region with less X-Y differentiation, where there is a significant excess of male SNPs in laboratory populations (Stratum II, 15–22 Mb) (see Fig. 3). (b,d and f) Distribution of sex differences in normalized SNP density for the X-Y diverged region (Strata I and II, 15–25 Mb) for Yarra (b), Quare (d) and Aripo (f) watersheds. **P-value<0.020, *P-value<0.050 based on permutation tests.

References

    1. Bachtrog D. Y chromosome evolution: emerging insights into processes of Y chromosome degeneration. Nat. Rev. Genet. 14, 113–124 (2013). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bachtrog D. et al.. Are all sex chromosomes created equal? Trends Genet. 27, 350–357 (2011). - PubMed
    1. Bull J. J. Evolution of Sex Determining Mechanisms Benjamin Cummings (1983).
    1. Fisher R. A. The evolution of dominance. Biol. Rev. 6, 345–368 (1931).
    1. Rice W. R. The accumulation of sexually antagonistic genes as a selective agent promoting the evolution of reduced recombination between primitive sex chromosomes. Evolution 41, 911–914 (1987). - PubMed

Publication types