Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017;31(3):370-378.
doi: 10.1080/02699052.2016.1231344. Epub 2017 Jan 31.

Head injury serum markers for assessing response to trauma: Design of the HeadSMART study

Affiliations

Head injury serum markers for assessing response to trauma: Design of the HeadSMART study

Matthew E Peters et al. Brain Inj. 2017.

Abstract

Background: Accurate diagnosis and risk stratification of traumatic brain injury (TBI) at time of presentation remains a clinical challenge. The Head Injury Serum Markers for Assessing Response to Trauma study (HeadSMART) aims to examine blood-based biomarkers for diagnosing and determining prognosis in TBI.

Methods: HeadSMART is a 6-month prospective cohort study comparing emergency department patients evaluated for TBI (exposure group) to (1) emergency department patients evaluated for traumatic injury without head trauma and (2) healthy persons. Study methods and characteristics of the first 300 exposure participants are discussed.

Results: Of the first 300 participants in the exposure arm, 70% met the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine criteria for TBI, with the majority (80.1%) classified as mild TBI. The majority of subjects in the exposure arm had Glasgow Coma Scale scores of 13-15 (98.0%), normal head computed tomography (81.3%) and no prior history of concussion (71.7%).

Conclusion: With systematic phenotyping, HeadSMART will facilitate diagnosis and risk-stratification of the heterogeneous group of individuals currently diagnosed with TBI.

Keywords: TBI; Traumatic brain injury; biomarkers; blunt head trauma.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
This figure is a flowchart that summarizes how 300 subjects were enrolled after screening 1,778 potential subjects.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) National Center for Health Statistics. 2010. \,; 2010 National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NHAMCS), 2010.
    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention(CDC) NCfIPaC. 2003. Report to Congress on mild traumatic brain injury in the United States: steps to prevent a serious public health problem. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
    1. Kim E, Lauterbach EC, Reeve A, Arciniegas DB, Coburn KL, Mendez MF, Rummans TA, Coffey EC, Research ACo. 2007. Neuropsychiatric complications of traumatic brain injury: a critical review of the literature (a report by the ANPA Committee on Research). J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci 19(2):106–27. - PubMed
    1. Rao V, Koliatsos V, Ahmed F, Lyketsos C, Kortte K. 2015. Neuropsychiatric disturbances associated with traumatic brain injury: a practical approach to evaluation and management. Semin Neurol 35(1):64–82. - PubMed
    1. McMahon P, Hricik A, Yue JK, Puccio AM, Inoue T, Lingsma HF, Beers SR, Gordon WA, Valadka AB, Manley GT et al. 2014. Symptomatology and functional outcome in mild traumatic brain injury: results from the prospective TRACK-TBI study. J Neurotrauma 31(1):26–33. - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms