Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2016 Nov 30:10:600-614.
doi: 10.2174/1874325001610010600. eCollection 2016.

Salvage Procedures for Management of Prosthetic Joint Infection After Hip and Knee Replacements

Affiliations
Review

Salvage Procedures for Management of Prosthetic Joint Infection After Hip and Knee Replacements

Samer S S Mahmoud et al. Open Orthop J. .

Abstract

Background: The increasing load placed by joint replacement surgery on health care systems makes infection, even with the lowest rates, a serious concern that needs to be thoroughly studied and addressed using all possible measures.

Methods: A comprehensive review of the current literature on salvage procedures for recurrent PJIs using PubMed, EMBASE and CINAHL has been conducted.

Results: Prolonged suppressive antibiotic therapy (PSAT), resection arthroplasty and arthrodesis were the most common procedures performed. Suppressive antibiotic therapy is based on the use of well tolerated long term antibiotics in controlling sensitive organisms. Resection arthroplasty which should be reserved as a last resort provided more predictable outcomes in the hip whereas arthrodesis was associated with better outcomes in the knee. Various methods for arthrodesis including internal and external fixation have been described.

Conclusion: Despite good union and infection control rates, all methods were associated with complications occasionally requiring further surgical interventions.

Keywords: Antibiotics; Arthrodesis; Fusion; Girdlestone; Infection; Joint; Replacement; Resection.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. NJR 12th Annual Report. Available from: http://www.njrcentre.org.uk/njrcentre/Portals/0/Documents/England/Report... .
    1. Phillips J.E., Crane T.P., Noy M., Elliott T.S., Grimer R.J. The incidence of deep prosthetic infections in a specialist orthopaedic hospital: a 15-year prospective survey. J. Bone Joint Surg. Br. 2006;88(7):943–948. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.88B7.17150. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Vanhegan I.S., Malik A.K., Jayakumar P., Ul Islam S., Haddad F.S. A financial analysis of revision hip arthroplasty: the economic burden in relation to the national tariff. J. Bone Joint Surg. Br. 2012;94(5):619–623. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.94B5.27073. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Eid A.J., Berbari E.F., Sia I.G., Wengenack N.L., Osmon D.R., Razonable R.R. Prosthetic joint infection due to rapidly growing mycobacteria: report of 8 cases and review of the literature. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2007;45(6):687–694. doi: 10.1086/520982. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Chodos M.D., Johnson C.A. Hematogenous infection of a total knee arthroplasty with Klebsiella pneumoniae in association with occult adenocarcinoma of the cecum. J. Arthroplasty. 2009;24(1):158.e9–158.e13. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2007.12.018. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources